ArticleThe International migration review2022
Precarious Times, Professional Tensions: The Ethics of Migration Research and the Drive for Scientific Accountability.
Article in The International migration review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- With qualitative research, the risks of data sharing can outweigh the rewards.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Engaging migrants and immigrants in genetics research.Nature genetics · 2025Review
- Chasing scorpions across North Africa: Ethical reflections on life story research with Sub-Saharan migrants.Qualitative research : QR · 2025Article
- Gendered Family Violence Among Migrants Seeking International Protection: A Life Course Perspective.Social forces; a scientific medium of social study and interpretation · 2024Article
- Discomforting surplus: gender, sexualization, and omissions in ethnographic fieldwork.Frontiers in sociology · 2023Article
- Data sharing: A Long COVID perspective, challenges, and road map for the future.South African journal of scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
How should migration scholars navigate tensions between our ethical responsibilities to research participants and growing "open science" calls for data transparency, replication, and accountability? We elaborate a three-step process to navigate these tensions. First, researchers must understand core
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.