Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36467714›Full record

ReviewHeritage science2022

Bibliometric analysis of fourth industrial revolution applied to heritage studies based on web of science and scopus databases from 2016 to 2021.

Anibal Alviz-Meza, Manuel H Vásquez-Coronado, Jorge G Delgado-Caramutti, Daniel J Blanco-Victorio

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heritage science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anibal Alviz-MezaGrupo de Investigación en Deterioro de Materiales, Transición Energética y Ciencia de Datos DANT3, Faculty of Enginering, Arquitecture and Urbanism, Universidad Señor de Sipán, Chiclayo, Pimentel 14001 Peru.
Manuel H Vásquez-CoronadoSemillero de Investigación en Corrosión de Metales, Energías Sostenibles y Análisis de Datos - COMD3S, Faculty of Enginering, Arquitecture and Urbanism, Universidad Señor de Sipán, Chiclayo, Pimentel 14001 Peru.
Jorge G Delgado-CaramuttiINVESSALUD, Life sciences and human health care, Universidad Señor de Sipán, Chiclayo, Pimentel 14001 Peru.
Daniel J Blanco-VictorioINVESSALUD, Life sciences and human health care, Universidad Señor de Sipán, Chiclayo, Pimentel 14001 Peru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using past material and spiritual remains, cultural heritage examines communities' identity formation across time. Cultural heritage requires public and private institutions to care about its restoration, maintenance, conservation, and promotion. Through a bibliometric perspective, this study has analyzed, quantified, and mapped the scientific production of the fourth industrial revolution applied to heritage studies from 2016 to 2021 in the Scopus and Web of Science databases. Biblioshiny software from RStudio was employed to categorize and evaluate the contribution of authors, countries, institutions, and journals. In addition, VOSviewer was used to visualize their collaboration networks. As a main result, we found that augmented reality and remote sensing represent the research hotspot concerning heritage studies. Those techniques have become common in archaeology, as well as museums, leading to an increase in their activity. Perhaps, more recent tools, such as machine learning and deep learning, will provide future pathways in cultural heritage from data collected in social networks. This bibliometric analysis, therefore, provides an updated perspective of the implementations of technologies from industry 4.0 in heritage science as a possible guideline for future worldwide research.

Indexed as

BibliometricBiblioshinyHeritageIndustry 4.0ScopusVOSviewerWeb of Science

Identifiers

PMID36467714
PMCPMC9685106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.