ArticleFrontiers in neurorobotics2022
The comparison of electroencephalography power and event related potential in success and failure during multitask game.
Article in Frontiers in neurorobotics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Electroencephalogram-Based Analysis of Monomodal and Multimodal Interaction in Mixed Reality Games.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The first game-based treatment for children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2020. This game was developed for use at home as part of everyday training and can be used along with one's usual training plan. In this game, two tasks are performed in parallel: (1) a perceptual discrimination targeting task (response and not response and avoiding responding to sudden pop-up targets) and (2) a sensory-motor navigation task (players continuously adjust their location to interact with or avoid positional targets). However, the brain activity of people playing this game was not examined, and the immersive environment (3D virtual world) was not considered. Therefore, we aimed to develop a system to investigate brain activity using electroencephalography (EEG) during multitask gameplay in virtual reality (VR). In this experiment, we focused on the difference between the success and failure of the Go/No-Go task in a multitask game. We created a color discrimination task and a target tracking task in VR. The content of this game task was designed using previous multitask training. EEG and event data were recorded. Using event data, we can analyze the data in detail. We divided the trial types (Go and No-Go) and results (success and failure). We then compared the success and failure of each task. In the Go trial, the relative theta power in success at Fz was significantly higher than that of failure. However, no difference in power was observed in the No-Go trial. On the other hand, theta power was no different between success and failure in the other task. These results of the Go trial suggest that the participants were attentive to processing both tasks. Thus, it is possible that theta power in the frontal area 1 s before stimulation could predict the success or failure of the Go trial. On the other hand, the results of the No-Go trial may be due to the low number of No-Go failure trials and the fact that stimulus oversight is one of the factors for success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.