Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36467548›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of ageing2022

Loneliness, social network size and mortality in older adults: a meta-analysis.

Natasja Schutter, Tjalling J Holwerda, Hannie C Comijs, Max L Stek, Jaap Peen, Jack J M Dekker

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of ageing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mapping the factors of loneliness in older adults: the role of employment and work activity - a scoping review.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natasja SchutterDepartment of Geriatric Psychiatry, Arkin Mental Health Care, Nieuwe Kerkstraat 156, 1018 VM Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3334-5294
Tjalling J HolwerdaDepartment of Psychiatry, Arkin Mental Health Care, Roetersstraat 210, 1018 WE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hannie C ComijsGGZ InGeest/Department of Psychiatry and the Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Max L StekGGZ InGeest/Department of Psychiatry and the Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jaap PeenDepartment of Clinical Research, Arkin Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jack J M DekkerDepartment of Clinical Research, Arkin Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arkin · NLGGZ inGeest · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loneliness and social network size have been found to be predictors of mortality in older adults. The objective of this study was to investigate whether loneliness and small social network size are associated with an increased mortality risk and to review the evidence for either network size, or loneliness that constitutes the higher mortality risk. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE and PsychInfo in January/February 2018 and March/April 2021. Studies that mentioned outcome data were included in the meta-analysis and coded using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for Cohort Studies. The meta-analysis showed that both loneliness and small social network size are associated with mortality risk in older adults (Hazard Ratio 1.10 (95% Confidence Interval 1.06-1.14) for loneliness and 0.96 (95% Confidence Interval 0.93-0.99) for larger network size). Sensitivity analyses according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale yielded varying results. Heterogeneity was large. In conclusion, both loneliness and small social network size in older adults are associated with increased mortality, although the effect size is small. Targeting subjective and objective aspects of older adults' social contacts should be on the agenda of preventive as well as personalized medicine. In order to be able to compare the association between loneliness and network size and mortality, more studies are needed that include both these risk factors. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10433-022-00740-z.

Indexed as

LonelinessMortalitySocial isolationSocial network

Identifiers

PMID36467548
PMCPMC9685120
OpenAlexW4309643692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.