ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022
Gastric bypass
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01821508 (Prospective, Open,Randomized, Unicentre Study Comparing Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass With the Best Clinical Treatment Regarding Improvement of Microvascular Complications of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Obese Patients.), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective, Open,Randomized, Unicentre Study Comparing Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass With the Best Clinical Treatment Regarding Improvement of Microvascular Complications of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Obese Patients.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Weight-Loss Interventions on Kidney, Cardiometabolic and Anthropometric Outcomes in Adults With CKD and Overweight or Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Obesity surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative Analysis of Renal Function Outcomes Following Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obesity surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Metabolic/Bariatric Surgery is Safe and Effective in People with Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Obesity surgery · 2024Pooled it
- The Role of Bariatric Surgery in Kidney Disease: Evidence, Controversies, and Future Needs.Obesity surgery · 2026Review
- Renal Outcomes After Sleeve Gastrectomy versus Gastric Bypass in Patients with Nephropathy: Results from a Retrospective Study.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Review
- Obesity and Metabolic Health in CKD.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025Review
- Metabolic/bariatric surgery optimization: a position statement by Arabic association for the study of diabetes and metabolism (AASD).Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Review
- ASN Kidney Health Guidance on the Management of Obesity in Persons Living with Kidney Diseases.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2024Article
- How to assess kidney outcomes in obese people with substantial weight loss: the case of GLP1- and dual-receptor agonists.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2024Article
- The impact of weight loss on renal function in individuals with obesity and type 2 diabetes: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Review
- Recent advances in the treatment of patients with obesity and chronic kidney disease.Annals of medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We compared the albuminuria-lowering effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) to best medical treatment in patients with diabetic kidney disease and obesity to determine which treatment is better. Methods: A 5 year, open-label, single-centre, randomised trial studied patients with diabetic kidney disease and class I obesity after 1:1 randomization to best medical treatment (n = 49) or RYGB (n = 51). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving remission of microalbuminuria after 5 years. Secondary outcomes included improvements in diabetic kidney disease, glycemic control, quality of life, and safety. For efficacy outcomes, we performed an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01821508. Findings: 88% of patients (44 per arm) completed 5-year follow-up. Remission of albuminuria occurred in 59.6% (95% CI = 45.5-73.8) after best medical treatment and 69.7% (95% CI = 59.6-79.8) after RYGB (risk difference: 10%, 95% CI, -7 to 27, P = 0.25). Patients after RYGB were twice as likely to achieve an HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (60.2% versus 25.4%, risk difference, 34.9%; 95% CI = 15.8-53.9, P < 0.001). Quality of life after five years measured by the 36-Item Short Form Survey questionnaire (standardized to a 0-to-100 scale) was higher in the RYGB group than in the best medical treatment group for several domains. The mean differences were 13.5 (95% CI, 5.5-21.6, P = 0.001) for general health, 19.7 (95% CI, 9.1-30.3, P < 0.001) for pain, 6.1 (95% CI, -4.8 to 17.0, P = 0.27) for social functioning, 8.3 (95% CI, 0.23 to 16.3, P = 0.04) for emotional well-being, 12.2 (95% CI, 3.9-20.4, P = 0.004) for vitality, 16.8 (95% CI, -0.75 to 34.4, P = 0.06) for mental health, 21.8 (95% CI, 4.8-38.7, P = 0.01) for physical health and 11.1 (95% CI, 2.24-19.9, P = 0.01) for physical functioning. Serious adverse events were experienced in 7/46 (15.2%) after best medical treatment and 11/46 patients (24%) after RYGB (P = 0.80). Interpretation: Albuminuria remission was not statistically different between best medical treatment and RYGB after 5 years in participants with diabetic kidney disease and class 1 obesity, with 6-7 in ten patients achieving remission of microalbuminuria (uACR <30 mg/g) in both groups. RYGB was superior in improving glycemia, diastolic blood pressure, lipids, body weight, and quality of life. Funding: The study was supported by research grants from Johnson & Johnson Brasil, Oswaldo Cruz German Hospital, and by grant 12/YI/B2480 from Science Foundation Ireland (Dr le Roux) and grant 2015-02733 from the Swedish Medical Research Council (Dr le Roux). Dr Pereira was funded by the Chevening Scholarship Programme (Foreign and Commonwealth Office, UK).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.