ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
Machine learning improves risk stratification of coronary heart disease and stroke.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning and Cardiovascular Diseases: An Updated Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Current State of the Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Stroke: A Literature Review.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- A Machine Learning Model Integrating Tongue Image Features and Myocardial Injury Markers Predicts Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Scoping Review.Neurointervention · 2024Review
- Prognostic value of oxygen saturation index trajectory phenotypes on ICU mortality in mechanically ventilated patients: a multi-database retrospective cohort study.Journal of intensive care · 2023Article
- The application of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in electronic health record research: A scoping review.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coronary heart disease (CHD) and cerebral ischemic stroke (CIS) are two major types of cardiovascular disease (CVD) that are increasingly exerting pressure on the healthcare system worldwide. Machine learning holds great promise for improving the accuracy of disease prediction and risk stratification in CVD. However, there is currently no clinically applicable risk stratification model for the Asian population. This study developed a machine learning-based CHD and CIS model to address this issue. Methods: A case-control study was conducted based on 8,624 electronic medical records from 2008 to 2019 at the Tongji Hospital in Wuhan, China. Two machine learning methods (the random down-sampling method and the random forest method) were integrated into 2 ensemble models (the CHD model and the CIS model). The trained models were then interpreted using Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results: The CHD and CIS models achieved good performance with the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.895 and 0.884 in random testing, and 0.905 and 0.889 in sequential testing, respectively. We identified 4 common factors between CHD and CIS: age, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity, hypertension, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Moreover, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was identified as an independent indicator for CHD. Conclusions: Our ensemble models can provide risk stratification for CHD and CIS with clinically applicable performance. By interpreting the trained models, we provided insights into the common and unique indicators in CHD and CIS. These findings may contribute to a better understanding and management of risk factors associated with CVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.