ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
Analysis of anti-M antibody status and blood transfusion strategy in Hunan, China.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rapid Electrochemical Impedance Detection of the MiACS omega · 2026Article
- COVID-19 infection is associated with anti-M alloantibody development in pediatric patients: immunological characteristics and clinical implications for transfusion safety.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Anti-M Antibody in Blood Transfusion: An Underestimated Factor in Service Delays and Expenditures.Cureus · 2025Article
- Distribution and Genetic Characterization of the MNS Blood Group in Multi-Ethnic Populations of East China.Journal of blood medicine · 2025Article
- Establishment and application of suspension static method in blood group screening of automated blood group analyzer.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: By analyzing the detection rate of anti-M antibody in patients with the MNS blood group system in the Hunan area, we aimed to explore its clinical significance and blood transfusion strategy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients who had been confirmed to contain anti-M antibodies through serological methods such as the saline tube method and cassette anti-human globulin method. Results: Irregular antibody screening tests had been applied to 94,452 patients, from which 652 results were positive. Among those positive patients, 93 cases were positive for anti-M antibodies, accounting for 14.26% of the positive rate of irregular antibodies; 11 cases had a blood transfusion history, accounting for 11.8%; 59 cases had a pregnancy history, accounting for 63.4%; and 2 cases had a transplant history, accounting for 2.2%. The patients with anti-M antibodies included 23 pregnant woman, accounting for 24.7%, and 19 tumor patients, accounting for 20.4%. A total of 66 cases were immunoglobulin M (IgM) + immunoglobulin G (IgG) class, accounting for 71.0%, 26 cases were IgM class, accounting for 28.0%, and 1 case was IgG class, accounting for 1.0%. Conclusions: The detection rates of anti-M antibody in the Hunan area and unexpected antibodies in literature reports are mainly related to a pregnancy history, and the type of antibody is predominantly IgM + IgG class. The clinical significance of anti-M antibody cannot be ignored, and three media should be used for cross-matching of blood wherever possible to ensure the safety of blood transfusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.