ArticleActa informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH2022
Evaluation of Time-Varying Biomarkers in Mortality Outcome in COVID-19: an Application of Extended Cox Regression Model.
Article in Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Survival analysis of under-five mortality and associated risk factors using survival analysis approaches.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Advanced statistical methods for hazard modeling in cardiothoracic surgery: a comprehensive review of techniques and approaches.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2024Article
- Assessing the hazard of death, cardiac tamponade, and pericardial constriction among HIV and tuberculosis pericarditis patients using the extended Cox-hazard model: Intervention study.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Joint modeling of longitudinal and competing risks for assessing blood oxygen saturation and its association with survival outcomes in COVID-19 patients.Journal of education and health promotion · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: COVID-19 pandemic has created many challenges for clinicians. The monitoring trend for laboratory biomarkers is helpful to provide additional information to determine the role of those in the severity status and death outcome. Objective: This article aimed to evaluate the time-varying biomarkers by LOWESS Plot, check the proportional hazard assumption, and use to extended Cox model if it is violated. Methods: In the retrospective study, we evaluated a total of 1641 samples of confirmed patients with COVID-19 from October until March 2021 and referred them to the central hospital of Ayatollah Rohani Hospital affiliated with Babol University of medical sciences, Iran. We measured four biomarkers AST, LDH, NLR, and lymphocyte in over the hospitalization to find out the influence of those on the rate of death of COVID-19 patients. Results: The standard Cox model suggested that all biomarkers were prognostic factors of death (AST: HR=2.89, P<0.001, Lymphocyte: HR=2.60, P=0.004, LDH: HR=2.60, P=0.006, NLR: HR=1.80, P<0.001). The additional evaluation showed that the PH assumption was not met for the NLR biomarker. NLR biomarkers had a significant time-varying effect, and its effect increase over time (HR(t)=exp (0.234+0.261×log(t)), p=0.001). While the main effect of NLR did not show any significant effect on death outcome (HR=1.26, P=0.097). Conclusion: The reversal of results between the Cox PH model and the extended Cox model provides insight into the value of considering time-varying covariates in the analysis, which can lead to misleading results otherwise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.