ArticleInternational journal of social robotics2023
Utilizing an Emotional Robot Capable of Lip-Syncing in Robot-Assisted Speech Therapy Sessions for Children with Language Disorders.
Article in International journal of social robotics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Editorial: Human-robot interaction for children with special needs.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study scrutinizes the impacts of utilizing a socially assistive robot, the RASA robot, during speech therapy sessions for children with language disorders. Two capabilities were developed for the robotic platform to enhance children-robot interactions during speech therapy interventions: facial expression communication (containing recognition and expression) and lip-syncing. Facial expression recognition was conducted by training several well-known CNN architectures on one of the most extensive facial expressions databases, the AffectNet database, and then modifying them using the transfer learning strategy performed on the CK+ dataset. The robot's lip-syncing capability was designed in two steps. The first step was concerned with designing precise schemes of the articulatory elements needed during the pronunciation of the Persian phonemes (i.e., consonants and vowels). The second step included developing an algorithm to pronounce words by disassembling them into their components (including consonants and vowels) and then morphing them into each other successively. To pursue the study's primary goal, two comparable groups of children with language disorders were considered, the intervention and control groups. The intervention group attended therapy sessions in which the robot acted as the therapist's assistant, while the control group only communicated with the human therapist. The study's first purpose was to compare the children's engagement while playing a mimic game with the affective robot and the therapist, conducted via video coding. The second objective was to assess the efficacy of the robot's presence in the speech therapy sessions alongside the therapist, accomplished by administering the Persian Test of Language Development, Persian TOLD. According to the first scenario, playing with the affective robot is more engaging than playing with the therapist. Furthermore, the statistical analysis of the study's results indicates that participating in robot-assisted speech therapy (RAST) sessions enhances children with language disorders' achievements in comparison with taking part in conventional speech therapy interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.