Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36467206›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

Deep learning-based predictions of older adults' adherence to cognitive training to support training efficacy.

Ankita Singh, Shayok Chakraborty, Zhe He, Shubo Tian, Shenghao Zhang, Mia Liza A Lustria, Neil Charness, Nelson A Roque, Erin R Harrell, Walter R Boot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ankita SinghDepartment of Computer Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Shayok ChakrabortyDepartment of Computer Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Zhe HeSchool of Information, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Shubo TianDepartment of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Shenghao ZhangDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Mia Liza A LustriaSchool of Information, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Neil CharnessDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Nelson A RoqueDepartment of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States.
Erin R HarrellDepartment of Psychology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, United States.
Walter R BootDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
The Adherence Promotion with Person-centered Technology (APPT) Project: Promoting Adherence to Enhance the Early Detection and Treatment of Cognitive DeclineR01AG064529 · NIA · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BOOT, WALTER RICHARD · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NIA NIH HHS R01 AG064529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the population ages, the number of older adults experiencing mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Alzheimer's disease, and other forms of dementia will increase dramatically over the next few decades. Unfortunately, cognitive changes associated with these conditions threaten independence and quality of life. To address this, researchers have developed promising cognitive training interventions to help prevent or reverse cognitive decline and cognitive impairment. However, the promise of these interventions will not be realized unless older adults regularly engage with them over the long term, and like many health behaviors, adherence to cognitive training interventions can often be poor. To maximize training benefits, it would be useful to be able to predict when adherence lapses for each individual, so that support systems can be personalized to bolster adherence and intervention engagement at optimal time points. The current research uses data from a technology-based cognitive intervention study to recognize patterns in participants' adherence levels and predict their future adherence to the training program. We leveraged the feature learning capabilities of deep neural networks to predict patterns of adherence for a given participant, based on their past behavior. A separate, personalized model was trained for each participant to capture individualistic features of adherence. We posed the adherence prediction as a binary classification problem and exploited multivariate time series analysis using an adaptive window size for model training. Further, data augmentation techniques were used to overcome the challenge of limited training data and enhance the size of the dataset. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first research effort to use advanced machine learning techniques to predict older adults' daily adherence to cognitive training programs. Experimental evaluations corroborated the promise and potential of deep learning models for adherence prediction, which furnished highest mean F-scores of 75.5, 75.5, and 74.6% for the Convolution Neural Network (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network, and CNN-LSTM models respectively.

Indexed as

adherence predictionartificial intelligencecognitive trainingdeep learningearly detection of cognitive decline

Identifiers

PMID36467206
PMCPMC9713845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.