Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36467198›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2022

Bringing social interaction at the core of organizational neuroscience.

Sarah Boukarras, Donato Ferri, Althea Frisanco, Maria Luisa Farnese, Chiara Consiglio, Ilario Alvino, Francesco Bianchi, Andrea D'Acunto, Laura Borgogni, Salvatore Maria Aglioti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sarah BoukarrasDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Donato FerriDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Althea FrisancoSanta Lucia Foundation, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Maria Luisa FarneseDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Chiara ConsiglioDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Ilario AlvinoDepartment of Legal Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Francesco BianchiDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Andrea D'AcuntoEY, Rome, Italy.
Laura BorgogniDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Salvatore Maria AgliotiSanta Lucia Foundation, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organizations are composed of individuals working together for achieving specific goals, and interpersonal dynamics do exert a strong influence on workplace behaviour. Nevertheless, the dual and multiple perspective of interactions has been scarcely considered by Organizational Neuroscience (ON), the emerging field of study that aims at incorporating findings from cognitive and brain sciences into the investigation of organizational behaviour. This perspective article aims to highlight the potential benefits of adopting experimental settings involving two or more participants (the so-called "second person" approach) for studying the neural bases of organizational behaviour. Specifically, we stress the idea that moving beyond the individual perspective and capturing the dynamical relationships occurring within dyads or groups (e.g., leaders and followers, salespersons and clients, teams) might bring novel insights into the rising field of ON. In addition, designing research paradigms that reliably recreate real work and life situations might increase the generalizability and ecological validity of its results. We start with a brief overview of the current state of ON research and we continue by describing the second-person approach to social neuroscience. In the last paragraph, we try and outline how this approach could be extended to ON. To this end, we focus on leadership, group processes and emotional contagion as potential targets of interpersonal ON research.

Indexed as

hyperscanninginterpersonal psychophysiologyleadershiporganizational neurosciencesecond person neurosciencesocial interactionvirtual realityworkplace behaviour

Identifiers

PMID36467198
PMCPMC9714489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.