ArticleAnnals of operations research2022
Reliable container supply chain under disruption.
Article in Annals of operations research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we develop a reliable formulation based on a container network flow problem, along with the full implementation of an empty container management strategy in the context of an integer linear programming model. The proposed approach can play a key role in coping with disruption in the network and can offer a proactive measure for effective disruption management to maintain a stable level of reliability in supply capability. To formulate a reliable container network problem, we design the pattern of disruption, a rare and irregular uncertainty, based on binomial coefficients in the objective function. In this way, flow interruption due to disruption can be expressed in node- and arc-failures and can be properly managed. Furthermore, we provide a non-disruptive model based on a deterministic formulation derived from a bast-case scenario. Through numerical illustrations and sensitivity analyses, we conduct in-depth analyses on the impact of disruption in the container supply chain, and a benchmark model based on a bast-case scenario is used to determine disruption costs, for comparative study. In particular, the numerical experiments show that if both maritime and hinterland disruptions are not managed in advance, disruption costs derived from a benchmark model result in a significant surge according to increasing potential disruption risk. Throughout computational experiments, we also found that maritime disruption is more destructive to container supply capability than hinterland disruption is. In particular, critical findings show that when a certain level of threshold is violated, the proposed strategies are completely interrupted in a container supply chain. Therefore, proactive measures to keep up a reliability of container supply in a high-risk region are highly recommended for management side.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.