Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36466961›Full record

ReviewCurrent transplantation reports2022

Utilizing Social Media to Identify Potential Living Donors: Learning from US Living Donor Programs.

Angie G Nishio-Lucar, Heather F Hunt, Sarah E Booker, Laura A Cartwright, Lindsay Larkin, Stevan A Gonzalez, Jessica A Spiers, Titte Srinivas, Mahwish U Ahmad, Macey L Levan and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current transplantation reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Angie G Nishio-LucarDepartment of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1326-3013
Heather F HuntLIVE ON Organ Donation, Inc., Longmeadow, MA USA.
Sarah E BookerUnited Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), Richmond, VA USA.
Laura A CartwrightUnited Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), Richmond, VA USA.
Lindsay LarkinUnited Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), Richmond, VA USA.
Stevan A GonzalezDepartment of Medicine, Baylor Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor Scott & White All Saints Medical Center, Fort Worth, TX USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1322-5332
Jessica A SpiersVirginia Mason Transplant Center, Seattle, WA USA.
Titte SrinivasCareDx, South San Francisco, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6592-6304
Mahwish U AhmadCenter for Bioethics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6029-5849
Macey L LevanNew York University, New York, NY USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4239-1252
Pooja SinghDepartment of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0253-2970
Heather WertinBarnes Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO USA.
Cathy McAdamsNemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE USA.
Krista L LentineCenter for Abdominal Transplantation, SSM-Saint Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, MO USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9423-4849
Randolph SchafferDepartment of Surgery, Division of Organ Transplantation, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1490-162X

Funding

Living Donor Extended Time Outcomes (LETO) StudyR01DK120551 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HSU, CHI-YUAN, LENTINE, KRISTA L · 2019 to 2023
$3.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK120551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Living donor transplantation provides the best possible recipient outcomes in solid organ transplantation. Yet, identifying potential living donors can be a laborious and resource intensive task that heavily relies on the recipient's means and social network. Social media has evolved to become a key tool in helping to bring recipients and potential living donors together given its ease of utilization, widespread access, and improved recipient's comfort with public solicitation. However, in the USA, formal guidelines to direct the use of social media in this context are lacking. Recent Findings: To better inform the landscape and opportunities utilizing social media in living donation, the OPTN Living Donor Committee surveyed US transplant programs to explore programs' experiences and challenges when helping patients use social media to identify potential living donors (September 2019). A large majority of survey participants ( Summary: Transplant programs should become competent in the use of social media for potential living donor identification to empower patients interested in using this tool. Social media education should be provided to all patients regardless of voiced interest and, when appropriate, revisited at multiple time points. Programs should consider developing a "team of experts" that can provide focused education and support to patients embarking in social media living donor campaigns. Care should be taken to avoid exacerbating disparities in access to living donor transplantation. Effective and timely guidance to patients in the use of social media could enhance the identification of potential living donors. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40472-022-00382-1.

Indexed as

Living donationPracticesSocial mediaSurveyTransplantation

Identifiers

PMID36466961
PMCPMC9684893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.