Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36466959›Full record

ReviewMaterials today. Bio2022

Antibacterial smart hydrogels: New hope for infectious wound management.

Zahra Aliakbar Ahovan, Zahra Esmaeili, Behnaz Sadat Eftekhari, Sadjad Khosravimelal, Morteza Alehosseini, Gorka Orive, Alireza Dolatshahi-Pirouz, Narendra Pal Singh Chauhan, Paul A Janmey, Ali Hashemi and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials today. Bio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Polysaccharides self-healing hydrogel for skin regeneration.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Polyphenolic compounds inFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  13. Mapping the knowledge landscape ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zahra Aliakbar AhovanDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Zahra EsmaeiliCellular and Molecular Research Centre, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Behnaz Sadat EftekhariBioengineering Department, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Sadjad KhosravimelalCellular and Molecular Research Centre, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Morteza AlehosseiniDepartment of Materials Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran.
Gorka OriveNanoBioCel Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
Alireza Dolatshahi-PirouzDepartment of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Narendra Pal Singh ChauhanDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Bhupal Nobles' University, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Paul A JanmeyBioengineering Department, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Ali HashemiDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Subhas C Kundu3Bs Research Group, I3Bs - Research Institute on Biomaterials, Biodegradable and Biomimetics, Headquarters of the European Institute of Excellence on Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, University of Minho, AvePark, Guimaraes, Portugal.
Mazaher GholipourmalekabadiCellular and Molecular Research Centre, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Millions of people die annually due to uncured wound infections. Healthcare systems incur high costs to treat wound infections. Tt is predicted to become more challenging due to the rise of multidrug-resistant conditions. During the last decades, smart antibacterial hydrogels could attract attention as a promising solution, especially for skin wound infections. These antibacterial hydrogels are termed 'smart' due to their response to specific physical and chemical environmental stimuli. To deliver different drugs to particular sites in a controlled manner, various types of crosslinking strategies are used in the manufacturing process. Smart hydrogels are designed to provide antimicrobial agents to the infected sites or are built from polymers with inherent disinfectant properties. This paper aims to critically review recent pre-clinical and clinical advances in using smart hydrogels against skin wound infections and propose the next best thing for future trends. For this purpose, an introduction to skin wound healing and disease is presented and intelligent hydrogels responding to different stimuli are introduced. Finally, the most promising investigations are discussed in their related sections. These studies can pave the way for producing new biomaterials with clinical applications.

Indexed as

Burn woundsDrug deliveryHydrogelsThermo-responsiveThermo-sensitiveWound infections

Identifiers

PMID36466959
PMCPMC9709163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.