Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36466935›Full record

ReviewWater, air, and soil pollution2022

Metal-Organic Framework-Based Composites for the Detection and Monitoring of Pharmaceutical Compounds in Biological and Environmental Matrices.

Muhammad Rizwan, Vidhya Selvanathan, Atta Rasool, Muhammad Anees Ur Rehman Qureshi, Dure Najaf Iqbal, Qudsia Kanwal, Syed Salman Shafqat, Tahir Rasheed, Muhammad Bilal

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Water, air, and soil pollution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. MOF-Based Bioelectronic Supercapacitors.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Muhammad RizwanDepartment of Chemistry, University of Lahore, Lahore, 54000 Punjab Pakistan.
Vidhya SelvanathanSolar Energy Research Institute (SERI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan Malaysia.
Atta RasoolSchool of Chemistry, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad Anees Ur Rehman QureshiDepartment of Chemistry, Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Dure Najaf IqbalDepartment of Chemistry, University of Lahore, Lahore, 54000 Punjab Pakistan.
Qudsia KanwalDepartment of Chemistry, University of Lahore, Lahore, 54000 Punjab Pakistan.
Syed Salman ShafqatDepartment of Chemistry, Division of Science and Technology, University of Education, Lahore, 54000 Pakistan.
Tahir RasheedInterdisciplinary Research Centre for Advanced Materials, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran, 31261 Saudi Arabia.
Muhammad BilalInstitute of Chemical Technology and Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Technology, Poznan University of Technology, Berdychowo 4, 60695 Poznan, PL Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5388-3183
University of Lahore · PKAllama Iqbal Open University · PKEnergy Research Institute · RUKing Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals · SAPoznań University of Technology · PLUniversity of Okara · PKUniversity of the Punjab · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The production of synthetic drugs is considered a huge milestone in the healthcare sector, transforming the overall health, aging, and lifestyle of the general population. Due to the surge in production and consumption, pharmaceutical drugs have emerged as potential environmental pollutants that are toxic with low biodegradability. Traditional chromatographic techniques in practice are time-consuming and expensive, despite good precision. Alternatively, electroanalytical techniques are recently identified to be selective, rapid, sensitive, and easier for drug detection. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are known for their intrinsic porous nature, high surface area, and diversity in structural design that provides credible drug-sensing capacities. Long-term reusability and maintaining chemo-structural integrity are major challenges that are countered by ligand-metal combinations, optimization of synthetic conditions, functionalization, and direct MOFs growth over the electrode surface. Moreover, chemical instability and lower conductivities limited the mass commercialization of MOF-based materials in the fields of biosensing, imaging, drug release, therapeutics, and clinical diagnostics. This review is dedicated to analyzing the various combinations of MOFs used for electrochemical detection of pharmaceutical drugs, comprising antibiotics, analgesics, anticancer, antituberculosis, and veterinary drugs. Furthermore, the relationship between the composition, morphology and structural properties of MOFs with their detection capabilities for each drug species is elucidated.

Indexed as

Drug detectionElectrochemical sensingMetal organic frameworkPharmaceutical detection

Identifiers

PMID36466935
PMCPMC9685123
OpenAlexW4309889500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.