ArticleJournal of King Saud University. Science2023
Detection of the peptidyl epitope for vaccine development against MPV.
Article in Journal of King Saud University. Science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- In silico design of Ebola virus Glycoprotein antigenic peptides as vaccine candidates.PloS one · 2025Article
- Progress and prospects on vaccine development against monkeypox infection.Microbial pathogenesis · 2023Review
- Immunoinformatics and reverse vaccinology approach in designing a novel highly immunogenic multivalent peptide-based vaccine against the human monkeypox virus.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Monkeypox Virus (MPV) is the cause of zoonotic disease characterized by skin-eruption with pus cell formation and lymphadenopathy. This virus belongs to the Orthopoxvirus genus with DNA as its genetic material. Previously, this infection was reported from Africa and occasionally from USA and UK. However, recently there is a sudden surge of infection in non-epidemic countries and a new strain of MPVhas been discovered. Therefore it is important to revisit the phylogeny of MPV with the addition of new strains. Recently WHO also stressed the need of developing vaccines for new strains. In this scenario we have two objectives for this study -first, to reveal the exact phylogenetic position of the 2022 strain and second, to identify specific peptides which may be used for vaccine development in the future. Methods: The phylogenetic analysis was done with the help of Bayesian phylogeny. The dN/dS calculation was performed based on DNA polymerase genes of selected MPV strains. The peptidyl-epitope was searched in MPV2022/2 SLO strain with the help of several algorithms implemented in Allergen FP v.1.0, NetMHCII 2.3, MHCpred and Toxin Pred. The structure prediction of the proteins and peptides was performed through Hpepdock. The quality of the structures was validated through the Ramachandran plot. The molecular dynamics and simulation were performed through Gromacs software. The interaction between peptide and protein was assessed through Ligplot software. Results: The phylogenetic analysis revealed that the considered 2022 MPVstrains were close to the USA strains. The evolutionary analysis showed the volatile nature of the genome. Moreover, 9-mer peptide sequence was identified as an epitope for vaccine development. Conclusions: The emergence of more virulent strains in near future may not be ruled out. Immunocompromised patients are more susceptible to this virus hence sub-unit vaccine is a better choice than a recombinant or attenuated vaccine against monkeypox. We have identified a small stretch of specific peptide which may be used for developing a subunit vaccine against this virus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.