Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36466610›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in aging neuroscience2022

Deep learning approaches for noncoding variant prioritization in neurodegenerative diseases.

Alexander Y Lan, M Ryan Corces

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander Y LanGladstone Institute of Neurological Disease, San Francisco, CA, United States.
M Ryan CorcesGladstone Institute of Neurological Disease, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Gladstone Institutes · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Project 4: Cross-species Dissection of Cellular Response to APOE Genotype and AD Pathology Using Single-cell Multi-omicsP01AG073082 · NIA · J. DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES · PI HUANG, YADONG, MUCKE, LENNART · 2021 to 2025
$23.4M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG073082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining how noncoding genetic variants contribute to neurodegenerative dementias is fundamental to understanding disease pathogenesis, improving patient prognostication, and developing new clinical treatments. Next generation sequencing technologies have produced vast amounts of genomic data on cell type-specific transcription factor binding, gene expression, and three-dimensional chromatin interactions, with the promise of providing key insights into the biological mechanisms underlying disease. However, this data is highly complex, making it challenging for researchers to interpret, assimilate, and dissect. To this end, deep learning has emerged as a powerful tool for genome analysis that can capture the intricate patterns and dependencies within these large datasets. In this review, we organize and discuss the many unique model architectures, development philosophies, and interpretation methods that have emerged in the last few years with a focus on using deep learning to predict the impact of genetic variants on disease pathogenesis. We highlight both broadly-applicable genomic deep learning methods that can be fine-tuned to disease-specific contexts as well as existing neurodegenerative disease research, with an emphasis on Alzheimer's-specific literature. We conclude with an overview of the future of the field at the intersection of neurodegeneration, genomics, and deep learning.

Indexed as

gene regulationgenomicsmachine learningneurodegenerationnoncoding genetic variation

Identifiers

PMID36466610
PMCPMC9716280
OpenAlexW4309457652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.