ReviewFrontiers in aging neuroscience2022
Deep learning approaches for noncoding variant prioritization in neurodegenerative diseases.
Review in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence for Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis: From Traditional Machine Learning to Large Language Models.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Applications of large-scale artificial intelligence models in bioinformatics.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026Review
- Silencer variants are key drivers of gene up-regulation in Alzheimer's disease.Science advances · 2026Article
- AI-powered precision medicine: utilizing genetic risk factor optimization to revolutionize healthcare.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Role and Potential of Artificial Intelligence in Biomarker Discovery and Development of Treatment Strategies for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Decoding polygenic diseases: advances in noncoding variant prioritization and validation.Trends in cell biology · 2024Review
- Visceral fat and attribute-based medicine in chronic kidney disease.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Genetic insights into immune mechanisms of Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Determining how noncoding genetic variants contribute to neurodegenerative dementias is fundamental to understanding disease pathogenesis, improving patient prognostication, and developing new clinical treatments. Next generation sequencing technologies have produced vast amounts of genomic data on cell type-specific transcription factor binding, gene expression, and three-dimensional chromatin interactions, with the promise of providing key insights into the biological mechanisms underlying disease. However, this data is highly complex, making it challenging for researchers to interpret, assimilate, and dissect. To this end, deep learning has emerged as a powerful tool for genome analysis that can capture the intricate patterns and dependencies within these large datasets. In this review, we organize and discuss the many unique model architectures, development philosophies, and interpretation methods that have emerged in the last few years with a focus on using deep learning to predict the impact of genetic variants on disease pathogenesis. We highlight both broadly-applicable genomic deep learning methods that can be fine-tuned to disease-specific contexts as well as existing neurodegenerative disease research, with an emphasis on Alzheimer's-specific literature. We conclude with an overview of the future of the field at the intersection of neurodegeneration, genomics, and deep learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.