Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36466579›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2022

A review of recent advances in plant-pathogen detection systems.

Rhea Patel, Bappa Mitra, Madhuri Vinchurkar, Andrea Adami, Rajul Patkar, Flavio Giacomozzi, Leandro Lorenzelli, Maryam Shojaei Baghini

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Microbial Nanoparticles in Biological Plant Protection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Addition of two new genera-Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rhea PatelCenter for Research in Nanotechnology and Science, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, 400076, India.
Bappa MitraCenter for Sensors & Devices, Fondazione Bruno Kessler (FBK), Trento, 38123, Italy.
Madhuri VinchurkarDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, 400076, India.
Andrea AdamiCenter for Sensors & Devices, Fondazione Bruno Kessler (FBK), Trento, 38123, Italy.
Rajul PatkarDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, 400076, India.
Flavio GiacomozziCenter for Sensors & Devices, Fondazione Bruno Kessler (FBK), Trento, 38123, Italy.
Leandro LorenzelliCenter for Sensors & Devices, Fondazione Bruno Kessler (FBK), Trento, 38123, Italy.
Maryam Shojaei BaghiniDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, 400076, India.
Fondazione Bruno Kessler · ITIndian Institute of Technology Bombay · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Worldwide, a substantial economic loss in agricultural products is caused by plant pathogens. The increased losses in agriculture have drawn attention towards the development of miniaturized pathogen detection systems for phytopathology. This review paper's main selling point supports recent research (from 2015 to 2022) and technological advancements in the field of plant pathogen detection. The article discusses in depth important developments in the loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay, microfluidics, Molecular Imprinted Polymer (MIP) based biosensors, digital droplet PCR (ddPCR), disposable all-printed electronics, and nanoparticle-based sensors for instantaneous pathogen detection in agricultural applications. Utilizing nanoparticles to identify agricultural pathogens is a crucial topic that is explored. A brief on various commercially available detection systems worldwide have been listed. Finally, we discuss the perspective in the development of portable miniaturized systems and novel assay technologies based on advanced nanomaterials. Gold standard techniques: Although Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and culture counting have been widely used for plant pathogen detection, they are not appropriate for measurements made in the field due to their higher installation costs, lack of portability, need for well-equipped laboratories, and requirement of skilled personnel. Therefore, these recent trends are overtaking the traditional methods in Agri-diagnostics because of their superior performances and suitability for the task.

Indexed as

AgricultureBiosensorsMiniaturized systemsPathogen detection

Identifiers

PMID36466579
PMCPMC9712134
OpenAlexW4310169006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.