Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36466498›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Knowledge, attitude, acceptance, and practice of COVID-19 vaccination and associated factors complemented with constructs of health belief model among the general public in South Gondar, Ethiopia: A community-based study.

Hiwot Yisak, Birhanie Ambaw, Emaway Belay, Tsion Desalegn, Adanech Getie, Meswat Asrat, Asrate Guangul, Tigist Seid, Edgeit Abebe Zewde, Mengesha Assefa and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiwot YisakDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Birhanie AmbawDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Emaway BelayDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Tsion DesalegnDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Adanech GetieDepartment of Midwifery, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Meswat AsratDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Asrate GuangulDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Tigist SeidDepartment of Midwifery, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Edgeit Abebe ZewdeDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Mengesha AssefaDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Amien EwuneteiDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Debre Tabor University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Understanding the epidemiological dynamics of disease control, as well as the effectiveness, compliance, and success of the vaccination program requires an understanding of the local population's knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding the Corona Virus Disease of 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. Thus, the objective of this study was to assess knowledge, attitude, and practice toward COVID-19 vaccination and associated factors among the general public. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the South Gondar Zone, among residents above the age of 18 years. The study used objective measures and the constructs of the Health Belief Model. Binary logistic regression was used and the result of the final model was presented in terms of adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), and statistical significance was taken and considered at a Results: The study was conducted on 1,111 study participants. The mean age is 30.83 ± 7.106. About 575 (51.8%) of the respondents have good knowledge about the COVID-19 vaccination and 43.4% have a positive attitude toward COVID-19 vaccination. About 361 (32.5%) of the respondents were willing to take the vaccine if it is available and 113 (10.2%) of them were vaccinated. Participants with a positive attitude and good knowledge, those with a secondary level of education AOR = 5.70, 95% CI (2.60-12.60), those with a monthly income of >2,000 birr AOR = 6.30, 95% CI (2.50-15.60), those having a television (TV), and those who use Facebook AOR = 17.70, 95% CI (10.10-30.90) had a higher level of acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination. The Health Belief Model's constructs of perceived susceptibility AOR = 1.53, 95% CI (1.26-1.85), perceived benefit AOR = 1.49, 95% CI (1.28-1.75), and cues to action AOR = 0.54, 95% CI (0.45-0.65) were all linked to COVID-19 vaccine acceptability. Conclusion: The level of acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination is much lower. Having a positive attitude score and good knowledge score, level of education, monthly income, presence of TV, the use of Facebook, and knowing the means of transmission of COVID-19 increase the level of acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaHealth Belief ModelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesacceptanceattitudeCOVID-19 vaccinationHealth Belief Modelknowledge

Identifiers

PMID36466498
PMCPMC9714612
OpenAlexW4309609569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.