Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36466467›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

A four-generation family transmission chain of COVID-19 along the China-Myanmar border in October to November 2021.

Xiangyu Yan, Wei Xiao, Saipeng Zhou, Xuechun Wang, ZeKun Wang, Mingchen Zhao, Tao Li, Zhongwei Jia, Bo Zhang, Tiejun Shui

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xiangyu YanSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Wei XiaoMang City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Mang, China.
Saipeng ZhouMang City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Mang, China.
Xuechun WangSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
ZeKun WangSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Mingchen ZhaoSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Tao LiSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Zhongwei JiaSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Bo ZhangSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Tiejun ShuiYunnan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Kunming, China.
Peking University · CNBeijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence · CNChinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention · CNYunnan Center for Disease Control And Prevention · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Foreign imported patients and within-household transmission have been the focus and difficulty of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prevention and control, which has also posed challenges to border areas' management. However, household transmission caused by foreign imported cases has not been reported in China's border areas. This study aimed to reveal a clear family clustering transmission chain of COVID-19 caused by contact with Myanmar refugees along the China-Myanmar border during an outbreak in October to November 2021. Methods: During the outbreak, detailed epidemiological investigations were conducted on confirmed patients with COVID-19 and their close contacts in daily activities. Patients were immediately transported to a designated hospital for treatment and quarantine, and their close contacts were quarantined at designated sites. Regular nucleic acid testing and SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing were provided to them. Results: A clear four-generation family clustering transmission involving five patients with COVID-19 was found along the China-Myanmar border. The index case (Patient A) was infected by brief conversations with Myanmar refugees across border fences during work. His wife (Patient B) and 9-month-old daughter (Patient C) were second-generation cases infected by daily contact with him. His 2-year-old daughter (Patient D) was the third-generation case infected by her mother and sister during quarantine in the same room and then transmitted the virus to her grandmother (Patient E, the fourth-generation case) who looked after her after Patients B and C were diagnosed and transported to the hospital. The household secondary attack rate was 80.0%, the average latent period was 4 days, and the generation time was 3 days. Ten of 942 close contacts (1.1%) of this family had positive IgM antibody during the medical observation period. In total 73.9% (696/942) of them were positive for IgG antibody and 8.3% (58/696) had IgG levels over 20 S/CO (optical density of the sample/cut-off value of the reagent). Conclusion: This typical transmission chain indicated that it is essential to strengthen COVID-19 prevention and control in border areas, and explore more effective children care approaches in quarantine sites.

Indexed as

COVID-19ChildChild, PreschoolDisease OutbreaksFemaleHumansInfantMaleMyanmarQuarantineSARS-CoV-2China-Myanmar borderCOVID-19outbreakrefugeestransmission chain

Identifiers

PMID36466467
PMCPMC9714430
OpenAlexW4309603542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.