Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36466274›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Ernst D Schäfer, Ishan Ajmera, Etienne Farcot, Markus R Owen, Leah R Band, Jonathan P Lynch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ernst D SchäferDepartment of Plant Science, Pennysylvania State University, State College, PA, United States.
Ishan AjmeraDepartment of Plant Science, Pennysylvania State University, State College, PA, United States.
Etienne FarcotSchool of Mathematical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Markus R OwenSchool of Mathematical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Leah R BandSchool of Mathematical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Jonathan P LynchDepartment of Plant Science, Pennysylvania State University, State College, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drought is a primary constraint to crop yields and climate change is expected to increase the frequency and severity of drought stress in the future. It has been hypothesized that crops can be made more resistant to drought and better able to sequester atmospheric carbon in the soil by selecting appropriate root phenotypes. We introduce

Indexed as

carbon assimilationdroughtFarquhar-von Caemmerer-Berry (FvCB) biochemical modelfunctional-structural plant/soil modelmaizeOpenSimRoot_v2root phenotypessoil carbon sequestration

Identifiers

PMID36466274
PMCPMC9713484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.