Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36466237›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2022

Application of crop wild relatives in modern breeding: An overview of resources, experimental and computational methodologies.

Soodeh Tirnaz, Jaco Zandberg, William J W Thomas, Jacob Marsh, David Edwards, Jacqueline Batley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Standardized microhaplotype databases and frameworks for assessing and mining crop genetic diversity.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. A new bacterial blight resistance geneFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Soodeh TirnazSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Jaco ZandbergSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
William J W ThomasSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Jacob MarshSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
David EdwardsSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Jacqueline BatleySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global agricultural industries are under pressure to meet the future food demand; however, the existing crop genetic diversity might not be sufficient to meet this expectation. Advances in genome sequencing technologies and availability of reference genomes for over 300 plant species reveals the hidden genetic diversity in crop wild relatives (CWRs), which could have significant impacts in crop improvement. There are many

Indexed as

ex situ resourcesin situ resourcesmodern breedingpangenomewild species

Identifiers

PMID36466237
PMCPMC9712971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.