Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36466209›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2022

Saliva-based methods for SARS-CoV-2 testing in low- and middle-income countries.

Steph H Tan, Orchid M Allicock, Achilles Katamba, Christine V F Carrington, Anne L Wyllie, Mari Armstrong-Hough

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Scalable solutions for global health: the SalivaDirect model.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. [Effects of coffee consumption on salivary cortisol and alpha amylase in young adults].Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steph H TanDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College St, New Haven, CT06510, United States of America (USA).
Orchid M AllicockDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College St, New Haven, CT06510, United States of America (USA).
Achilles KatambaUganda TB Implementation Research Consortium, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Christine V F CarringtonDepartment of Preclinical Sciences, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
Anne L WyllieDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College St, New Haven, CT06510, United States of America (USA).
Mari Armstrong-HoughDepartments of Social & Behavioral Science and Epidemiology, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, USA.
University of the West Indies · TT

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to disproportionately affect low- and middle-income countries, the need for simple, accessible and frequent diagnostic testing grows. In lower-resource settings, case detection is often limited by a lack of available testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). To address global inequities in testing, alternative sample types could be used to increase access to testing by reducing the associated costs. Saliva is a sensitive, minimally invasive and inexpensive diagnostic sample for SARS-CoV-2 detection that is appropriate for asymptomatic surveillance, symptomatic testing and at-home collection. Saliva testing can lessen two major challenges faced by lower- and middle-income countries: constrained resources and overburdened health workers. Saliva sampling enables convenient self-collection and requires fewer resources than swab-based methods. However, saliva testing for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics has not been implemented on a large scale in low- and middle-income countries. While numerous studies based in these settings have demonstrated the usefulness of saliva sampling, there has been insufficient attention on optimizing its implementation in practice. We argue that implementation science research is needed to bridge this gap between evidence and practice. Low- and middle-income countries face many barriers as they continue their efforts to provide mass COVID-19 testing in the face of substantial inequities in global access to vaccines. Laboratories should look to replicate successful approaches for sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva, while governments should act to facilitate mass testing by lifting restrictions that limit implementation of saliva-based methods.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2COVID-19 TestingDeveloping CountriesHumansSaliva

Identifiers

PMID36466209
PMCPMC9706358
OpenAlexW4310788246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.