SynthesisFrontiers in neuroscience2022
Effects of rhythmic auditory stimulation on motor function and balance ability in stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical randomized controlled studies.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07702513 (A Pilot Randomized Waitlist-Controlled Study of Home-Based Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation to Evaluate Mobility, Balance, and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Pilot Randomized Waitlist-Controlled Study of Home-Based Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation to Evaluate Mobility, Balance, and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of wearable rhythmic auditory stimulation on Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, and stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- The effects of rhythmic auditory stimulation on functional ambulation after stroke: a systematic review.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2024Pooled it
- Effects of unilateral step training along with rhythmic auditory stimulation on balance and postural stability in stroke patients.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Efficacy of bilateral soft exoskeleton training for people with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Trial
- Article
- A Multimodal Therapist-Supervised Robotic Gait-Training Platform with Phase-Synchronized Infrared Thermal Biofeedback: A Concept-Level Technical and Translational Healthcare Framework.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effects of Gait Biofeedback Training on Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters in Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Effects of Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation Using Sensory Feedback-Based Wearable Devices on the Gait and Balance in Patients with Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- Discriminative compensatory activation during auditory beat perception in Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Effects of heartfulness and bell meditation on brain activities and autonomic function in university students: An exploratory study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- Comparison of Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation Gait Training with and Without Vibrotactile Feedback on Balance and Gait in Persons with Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Music Therapy and Music-Based Interventions in Pediatric Neurorehabilitation.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Integrating rhythmic auditory stimulation in intelligent rehabilitation technologies for enhanced post-stroke recovery.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- One-year budget impact of InTandem™: a novel neurorehabilitation system for individuals with chronic stroke walking impairment.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2024Article
- Efficacy of a Single-Bout of Auditory Feedback Training on Gait Performance and Kinematics in Healthy Young Adults.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Organ pedalboard as a rehabilitation tool: A qualitative exploratory study of healthcare providers' perceptions and recommendations.PloS one · 2024Article
- Validating the Safe and Effective Use of a Neurorehabilitation System (InTandem) to Improve Walking in the Chronic Stroke Population: Usability Study.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2023Article
- Does Music Therapy Improve Gait after Traumatic Brain Injury and Spinal Cord Injury? A Mini Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Editorial: Exercise-induced neuroplasticity in neurodegeneration diseases.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) belongs to neurologic music therapy, which has attracted clinical attention because of its efficacy in motor function after stroke. This study aimed to summarize the effectiveness of rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) for the treatment of motor function and balance ability in stroke through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: All studies were retrieved from six databases. The effects of RAS on stroke were determined using the following indicators: motor function including step length, step cadence, velocity, Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA); and balance ability including overall balance index (OBI) and Berg Balance Scale (BBS). The risk map of bias of the quality of the studies and the meta-analysis results of the indicators was prepared using RevMan 5.2 software. Results: A total of 1,363 abstracts were retrieved. Among them, 325 duplicate studies were eliminated, and 971 studies were excluded after reading the titles and abstracts. In addition, by downloading the full text for further reading and screening, 47 studies were excluded. A total of 22 studies were included in the systematic review, and 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Assessment of quality, based on the PEDro scale, two studies had low quality, three studies had excellent quality, and the other studies had good quality; based on the Cochrane Collaborative Network Bias Risk Assessment Scale. A total of 15 studies specifically explained the random methods used. Meanwhile, seven studies did not report random sequence generation. A total of 10 studies reported that the evaluation of experimental results was blinded. In the meta-analysis, the results of motor function [namely, velocity (SMD = 0.99, 95% CI (0.43, 1.55)), step length (SMD = 0.97, 95% CI (0.74, 1.20)), and step cadence (MD = 5.16, 95% CI (4.17, 6.14)), FMA (MD = 2.93, 95% CI (2.04, 3.83))], were statistically significant ( Conclusions: RAS could improve gait parameters, walking function, and balance ability of individuals with stroke. However, studies or samples of outcome indicators for balance ability of stroke patients is relatively insufficient, which also requires further research in the future. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42021225102.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.