Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36466157›Full record

ArticleMediators of inflammation2022

Significance of Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Carbon Monoxide in Auxiliary Diagnosis and Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis.

Chuanliang Zhao, Mali Qin, Ling Jin, Ju Lai, Yang Wang, Shuangxi Liu, Shaoqing Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mediators of inflammation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Nasal nitric oxide measurement in allergic rhinitis and non-allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chuanliang ZhaoDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2907-0507
Mali QinDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China.
Ling JinDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9867-385X
Ju LaiDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China.
Yang WangDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China.
Shuangxi LiuDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China.
Shaoqing YuDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2208-4535

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The concentration of exhaled NO and CO is considered as a candidate marker of respiratory inflammatory disease. This report discusses the exhaled NO and CO in the auxiliary diagnosis and evaluation of allergic rhinitis (AR). Methods: 60 AR patients from October 2017 to March 2019, compared with 30 healthy controls. The severity of AR disease was distinguished by symptom score. Both groups were tested for exhaled nitric oxide through the nose or mouth and exhale carbon monoxide through the mouth. AR patients received glucocorticoid nasal spray for 1 month and were tested again for nNO, eNO, eCO, and symptom score. Results: Before treatment, all the nNO, eNO, and eCO of the AR group were higher than the control group. There were differences in the severe and moderate subgroup: severe > moderate > mild. eCO was not significantly different between the mild and control groups. The nNO, eNO, and eCO levels were positively correlated with symptom score. After treatment, nNO decreased significantly in the three subgroups; eNO and eCO in the severe AR group decreased significantly. Drawing the ROC curve, the area under curve (AUC) of nNO is 0.978. The AUC of eNO and eCO was 0.786 and 0.577, respectively. Conclusion: The nNO, eNO, and eCO in the AR group are higher than healthy people, which positively correlated with the severity of AR symptoms. The detection of nNO, eNO, and eCO can monitor the changes of AR. The detection of nNO level as an indicator of AR auxiliary diagnosis has high accuracy.

Indexed as

Carbon MonoxideRhinitis, AllergicArea Under CurveExhalationHumansNitric OxideCarbon MonoxideNitric Oxide

Identifiers

PMID36466157
PMCPMC9712024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.