Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36466138›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2022

Defining biologically relevant and hierarchically nested population units to inform wildlife management.

Michael S O'Donnell, David R Edmunds, Cameron L Aldridge, Julie A Heinrichs, Adrian P Monroe, Peter S Coates, Brian G Prochazka, Steve E Hanser, Lief A Wiechman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michael S O'DonnellU.S. Geological Survey Fort Collins Science Center Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3488-003X
David R EdmundsU.S. Geological Survey Fort Collins Science Center Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5212-8271
Cameron L AldridgeU.S. Geological Survey Fort Collins Science Center Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3926-6941
Julie A HeinrichsNatural Resource Ecology Laboratory, U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center Colorado State University Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7733-5034
Adrian P MonroeU.S. Geological Survey Fort Collins Science Center Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0934-8225
Peter S CoatesU.S. Geological Survey Western Ecological Research Center Dixon California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2672-9994
Brian G ProchazkaU.S. Geological Survey Western Ecological Research Center Dixon California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7270-5550
Steve E HanserU.S. Geological Survey Fort Collins Science Center Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4430-2073
Lief A WiechmanU.S. Geological Survey Ecosystems Mission Area Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3804-4426

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wildlife populations are increasingly affected by natural and anthropogenic changes that negatively alter biotic and abiotic processes at multiple spatiotemporal scales and therefore require increased wildlife management and conservation efforts. However, wildlife management boundaries frequently lack biological context and mechanisms to assess demographic data across the multiple spatiotemporal scales influencing populations. To address these limitations, we developed a novel approach to define biologically relevant subpopulations of hierarchically nested population levels that could facilitate managing and conserving wildlife populations and habitats. Our approach relied on the Spatial "K"luster Analysis by Tree Edge Removal clustering algorithm, which we applied in an agglomerative manner (bottom-to-top). We modified the clustering algorithm using a workflow and population structure tiers from least-cost paths, which captured biological inferences of habitat conditions (functional connectivity), dispersal capabilities (potential connectivity), genetic information, and functional processes affecting movements. The approach uniquely included context of habitat resources (biotic and abiotic) summarized at multiple spatial scales surrounding locations with breeding site fidelity and constraint-based rules (number of sites grouped and population structure tiers). We applied our approach to greater sage-grouse (

Indexed as

Centrocercus urophasianusclusteringgreater sage‐grousehierarchical population management unitspopulation structuresagebrush biome

Identifiers

PMID36466138
PMCPMC9712811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.