Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36466119›Full record

ArticleOperations research for health care2021

Modelling the effect of first-wave COVID-19 on mental health services.

B J Murch, J A Cooper, T J Hodgett, E L Gara, J S Walker, R M Wood

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Operations research for health care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B J MurchBristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group, UK National Health Service, South Plaza, Marlborough St, Bristol, BS1 3NX, UK.
J A CooperBristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group, UK National Health Service, South Plaza, Marlborough St, Bristol, BS1 3NX, UK.
T J HodgettBristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group, UK National Health Service, South Plaza, Marlborough St, Bristol, BS1 3NX, UK.
E L GaraBristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group, UK National Health Service, South Plaza, Marlborough St, Bristol, BS1 3NX, UK.
J S WalkerResearch and Development, Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership, Newbridge Hill, Bath, BA1 3QE, UK.
R M WoodBristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group, UK National Health Service, South Plaza, Marlborough St, Bristol, BS1 3NX, UK.
National Health Service · GBAvon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic it emerged that the nature and magnitude of demand for mental health services was changing. Considerable increases were expected to follow initial lulls as treatment was sought for new and existing conditions following relaxation of 'lockdown' measures. For this to be managed by the various services that constitute a mental health system, it would be necessary to complement such projections with assessments of capacity, in order to understand the propagation of demand and the value of any consequent mitigations. This paper provides an account of exploratory modelling undertaken within a major UK healthcare system during the first wave of the pandemic, when actionable insights were in short supply and decisions were made under much uncertainty. In understanding the impact on post-lockdown operational performance, the objective was to evaluate the efficacy of two considered interventions against a baseline 'do nothing' scenario. In doing so, a versatile and purpose-built discrete time simulation model was developed, calibrated and used by a multi-disciplinary project working group. The solution, representing a multi-node, multi-server queueing network with reneging, is implemented in open-source software and is freely and publicly available.

Indexed as

CoronavirusCOVID-19Mental healthQueueing networkSimulation

Identifiers

PMID36466119
PMCPMC9701315
OpenAlexW3194759188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.