ArticleCase reports in ophthalmology
Intravitreal Injection of Brolucizumab for Recalcitrant Macular Edema due to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Small Case Series.
Article in Case reports in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Off-label intravitreal brolucizumab and bevacizumab for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- The Diagnosis and Treatment of Branch Retinal Vein Occlusions: An Update.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This was a single center, prospective uncontrolled nonrandomized case series. Two eyes with recalcitrant ME secondary to CRVO, who have received a minimum of ten intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections, underwent IVI brolucizumab (BRZ). Patients underwent best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) testing, ophthalmic examination, and optical coherence tomography at baseline and follow-up visits (weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16). Both patients demonstrated notable improvement in BCVA and reduction of fluid on SD-OCT lasting up to week 12. At week 16, though both the eyes maintained the visual acuity gains, early increase in fluid was noted in both cases, for which second dose of IVI BRZ was given. No ocular or systemic adverse events were noted in these 2 cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.