ArticleDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy2022
A Retrospective Evaluation of Pregnancy Outcomes Following Bariatric Surgery: A Single-Center Experience.
Article in Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nutritional Implications of Bariatric Surgery on Pregnancy Management-A Narrative Review of the Literature.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- The Effect of Sleeve Gastrectomy on Pregnancy Complications: A Cross-Sectional Study in Saudi Arabia.Cureus · 2023Article
- Maternal Bariatric Surgery and Offspring Health: A Sibling Matched Analysis Comparing Offspring Born before and after the Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) is an effective treatment for obesity and its complications, but its effect on pregnancy outcomes is inconclusive. The present study aimed to investigate women's pregnancy status and outcomes as well as the impact of pregnancy intervals after BMS. Methods: The menstrual cycle and fertility status of women who underwent BMS in our centre between July 2010 and January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed and followed up until one-year post-delivery. The pregnancy outcomes after BMS were observed, including changes in weight, pregnancy interval, pregnancy complications, weight and health status of the newborn (premature birth, admission to neonatology, or deformity). Results: We identified 31 women who were successfully conceived after BMS. There were statistical differences in weight and menstrual status before and post-operation ( Conclusion: The present results suggest that the abortion rate in pregnancy intervals less than 2 years was higher than those ≥2 years. It is recommended that postoperative patients avoid pregnancy until their weight is stable to reduce the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.