ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2022
Sparse measures with swarm-based pliable hidden Markov model and deep learning for EEG classification.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ensemble Fusion Models Using Various Strategies and Machine Learning for EEG Classification.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In comparison to other biomedical signals, electroencephalography (EEG) signals are quite complex in nature, so it requires a versatile model for feature extraction and classification. The structural information that prevails in the originally featured matrix is usually lost when dealing with standard feature extraction and conventional classification techniques. The main intention of this work is to propose a very novel and versatile approach for EEG signal modeling and classification. In this work, a sparse representation model along with the analysis of sparseness measures is done initially for the EEG signals and then a novel convergence of utilizing these sparse representation measures with Swarm Intelligence (SI) techniques based Hidden Markov Model (HMM) is utilized for the classification. The SI techniques utilized to compute the hidden states of the HMM are Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Differential Evolution (DE), Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), and Backtracking Search Algorithm (BSA), thereby making the HMM more pliable. Later, a deep learning methodology with the help of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) was also developed with it and the results are compared to the standard pattern recognition classifiers. To validate the efficacy of the proposed methodology, a comprehensive experimental analysis is done over publicly available EEG datasets. The method is supported by strong statistical tests and theoretical analysis and results show that when sparse representation is implemented with deep learning, the highest classification accuracy of 98.94% is obtained and when sparse representation is implemented with SI-based HMM method, a high classification accuracy of 95.70% is obtained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.