Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36465950›Full record

ArticleGlobal implementation research and applications2022

Proceedings from the Second Annual Conference of the Norwegian Network for Implementation Research.

Karina M Egeland, Thomas Engell, Jeanette Halvorsen, Cecilie Varsi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global implementation research and applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Karina M EgelandNorwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies (NKVTS), Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6757-4696
Thomas EngellCentre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Jeanette HalvorsenNorwegian Centre for Learning Environment and Behavioral Research in Education, Faculty of Arts and Education, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Cecilie VarsiFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.
Center for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway · NONorwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies · NOUniversity of South-Eastern Norway · NOUniversity of Stavanger · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2019, Norwegian implementation researchers formed a network to promote implementation research and practice in the Norwegian context. On November 19th, 2021, the second annual Norwegian implementation conference was held in Oslo. Ninety participants from all regions of the country gathered to showcase the frontiers of Norwegian implementation research. The conference also hosted a panel discussion about critical next steps for implementation science in Norway. The conference included 17 presentations from diverse disciplines within health and welfare services, including schools. The themes presented included stakeholder engagement, implementation mechanisms, evaluations of the implementation of specific interventions, the use of implementation guidelines and frameworks, the development and validation of implementation measurements, and barriers and facilitators for implementation. The panel discussion highlighted several critical challenges with the implementation of evidence-informed practices in Norway, including limited implementation competence and capacity among practice leaders and workforces, few opportunities for education in implementation science, limited implementation research in the Norwegian context, scarce funding possibilities for implementation research, and a lack of long-term perspectives on implementation processes. Overall, the 2021 Norwegian implementation conference showed an encouraging sign of a maturing field of science in Norway. The more voluminous proceedings from the 2020 conference called for several important advancements to improve implementation science and practice in Norway, and the 2021 conference indicates that steps have already been taken in favorable directions in terms of, for instance, research designs and measurements. However, there are still unexploited potentials for improvements in implementation research, funding, policies, and practice. Norwegian implementation researcher should be mindful of the challenges and potential pitfalls implementation science currently face as a scientific discipline. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43477-022-00069-w.

Indexed as

Conference proceedingsImplementation researchNorwayResearch network

Identifiers

PMID36465950
PMCPMC9684746
OpenAlexW4309835921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.