Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36465936›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Inter and intra-observer agreement of arterial wall contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in giant cell arteritis.

Olivier Espitia, Olivier Robin, Jeanne Hersant, Christophe Roncato, Arthur Théry, Marie-Anne Vibet, Giovanni Gautier, Alizée Raimbeau, François-Xavier Lapébie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Olivier EspitiaNantes Université, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Nantes, Department of Internal and Vascular Medicine, Nantes, France.
Olivier RobinNantes Université, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Nantes, Department of Internal and Vascular Medicine, Nantes, France.
Jeanne HersantDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Angers, Angers, France.
Christophe RoncatoDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Saint-Louis, La Rochelle, France.
Arthur ThéryDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Marie-Anne VibetDepartment of Biostatistics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Nantes, Nantes, France.
Giovanni GautierNantes Université, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Nantes, Department of Internal and Vascular Medicine, Nantes, France.
Alizée RaimbeauNantes Université, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Nantes, Department of Internal and Vascular Medicine, Nantes, France.
François-Xavier LapébieDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRNantes Université · FRSociété Française de Médecine Vasculaire · FRCentre Hospitalier de La Rochelle · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze inter- and intra-observer agreement for contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) for monitoring disease activity in Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) in the wall of axillary arteries, and common carotid arteries. Methods: Giant cell arteritis patients have CEUS of axillary arteries and common carotid. These images were rated by seven vascular medicine physicians from four hospitals who were experienced in duplex ultrasonography of GCA patients. Two weeks later, observers again rated the same images. GCA patients were recruited in from December 2019 to February 2021. An analysis of the contrast of the ultrasound images with a gradation in three classes (grade 0, 1, and 2) was performed. Grade 0 corresponds to no contrast, grade 1 to moderate wall contrast and grade 2 to intense contrast. A new analysis in 2 classes: positive or negative wall contrast; was then performed on new series of images. Results: Sixty arterial segments were evaluated in 30 patients. For the three-class scale, intra-rater agreement was substantial: κ 0.70; inter-rater agreement was fair: κ from 0.22 to 0.27. Thirty-four videos had a wall thickness of less than 2 mm and 26 videos had a wall thickness greater than 2 mm. For walls with a thickness lower than 2 mm: intra-rater agreement was substantial: κ 0.69; inter-rater agreement was fair: κ 0.35. For walls with a thickness of 2 mm or more: intra-rater agreement was substantial: κ 0.53; inter-rater agreement was fair: κ 0.25. For analysis of parietal contrast uptake in two classes: inter-rater agreement was fair to moderate: κ from 0.35 to 0.41; and for walls with a thickness of 2 mm or more: inter-rater agreement was fair to substantial κ from 0.22 to 0.63. Conclusion: The visual analysis of contrast uptake in the wall of the axillary and common carotid arteries showed good intra-rater agreement in GCA patients. The inter-rater agreement was low, especially when contrast was analyzed in three classes. The inter-rater agreement for the analysis in two classes was also low. The inter-rater agreement was higher in two-class analysis for walls of 2 mm thickness or more.

Indexed as

agreementcontrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS)giant cell arteritisgiant cell arteritis–large-vessellarge-vessel vasculitis (LVV)

Identifiers

PMID36465936
PMCPMC9715579
OpenAlexW4309264911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.