ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Five years follow up of patient receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation: Data for a single center in Taiwan.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term respiratory stability of elderly patients recovering from acute respiratory failure and invasive mechanical ventilation: a retrospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Outcomes of different pulmonary rehabilitation protocols in patients under mechanical ventilation with difficult weaning: a retrospective cohort study.Respiratory research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The National Association for Medical Direction of Respiratory Care recommended tracking 1-year survival rates (the most relevant outcome) in patients treated with prolonged mechanical ventilation. However, patients treated with prolonged mechanical ventilation had higher mortality rates within the first 2 years after weaning. More knowledge regarding long-term mortality would help patients, families, and clinicians choose appropriate interventions and make end-of-life decisions. In this investigation, we attempted to determine the rates of long-term mortality for all patients treated with prolonged mechanical ventilation over a period of 10 years. Objective: The purpose of this investigation was to enhance the overall survival outcomes for patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation by identifying the factors affecting the 5-year mortality rates for these patients. Design: Retrospective observational study. Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, we explored the influential factors related to the overall survival outcomes of all patients treated with prolonged mechanical ventilation. We enrolled every individual admitted to the weaning unit between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2016. The length of survival for each patient was estimated from admission to the weaning unit until death or December 31, 2021, whichever came first. We analyzed the data to investigate the survival time, mortality rates, and survival curves in these patients. Results: Long-term follow-up information was gathered for 296 patients who received prolonged mechanical ventilation. There was better mean survival times in patients treated with prolonged mechanical ventilation with the following characteristics (in order): no comorbidities, tracheostomies, and intracranial hemorrhage. Successful weaning, receipt of tracheostomy, an age less than 75 years, and no comorbidities were associated with better long-term overall survival outcomes. Conclusion: Prolonged mechanical ventilation patients had abysmal overall survival outcomes. Even though prolonged mechanical ventilation patients' long-term survival outcomes are tragic, medical professionals should never give up on the dream of enhancing long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.