ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Clinical analysis of 96 patients with intraorbital foreign bodies: A 10-year retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Removal of a large and concealed wooden foreign body from the orbit and mandible using multimodal image navigation: a case report.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Clinical Analysis of Perforating Globe Injuries with Intraorbital Foreign Bodies: An 18-Year Retrospective Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Global, Regional, National and HDI-Stratified Burdens of Intraocular Foreign Bodies from 1990 to 2021: A Trend Analysis.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Retained plastic foreign body in the orbit after blunt trauma: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Application of intraorbital magnets in the removal of magnetic intraorbital foreign bodies.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Retrospective study of the effectiveness of scleral buckling under direct vision with operating lamp illumination in 17 cases of retinal detachment associated with retinal dialysis.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Neurosurgical robot-assisted transnasal endoscopic surgery in orbital-related diseases.Brain & spine · 2025Article
- Article
- Retained wood penetrating the inferior orbital fissure removed after several months from injury: A case report and a comprehensive literature review.Surgical neurology international · 2024Article
- T-shaped pars plana scleral incision to remove large intraocular foreign body.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Clinical features, radiological imaging, and treatment strategies of nonmetallic intraorbital foreign bodies: a retrospective analysis.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Pediatric open-globe injury: Current perspectives, surgical principles, and literature review.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To investigate the clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and surgical treatment of intraorbital foreign bodies (IOFBs). Methods: Patients with IOFBs were enrolled from Wuhan Union Hospital between January 2011 and January 2021. Demographic and clinical information was extracted, including gender, age, cause and entrance of the trauma, material, size and quantity of foreign body, visual function, ocular complications, imaging findings, and surgical intervention. The patients were divided into two groups according to the timeline, group A (from January 2011 to December 2015, Results: The 96 patients (81 men and 15 women) were enrolled in this series, with a median age of 39.5 (1.6-76.0) years. Work-related injuries were the cause of IOFBs in 45 individuals (46.9%). Three patients (3.3%) presented severe visual impairment, and 39 patients (42.4%) presented blindness. The majority of foreign bodies were metal (44.8%), followed by wood (26.0%). Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed, respectively, on 89 (92.7%) and 21 (21.9%) patients with IOFBs, in which the detection rate was 80.9% for CT and 81.0% for MRI. Among the 25 patients with intraorbital wooden foreign bodies (IOWFBs), the utilization and detection rates of MRI were 50.0% and 40.0% in group A, and 93.3% and 92.9% in group B, with significant differences in both rates between the two groups (both Conclusion: IOFBs were mainly caused by work-related injuries and might lead to serious visual impairment. The application and detectability of MRI in IOWFBs improved in recent years, and MRI presented better detectability than CT in diagnosing IOWFBs. Thus, MRI should be recommended despite negative CT findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.