Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36465830›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022

High-quality PET image synthesis from ultra-low-dose PET/MRI using bi-task deep learning.

Hanyu Sun, Yongluo Jiang, Jianmin Yuan, Haining Wang, Dong Liang, Wei Fan, Zhanli Hu, Na Zhang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. LowQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Feasibility of direct brainAsia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Automatic brain structure segmentation forQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hanyu Sun *Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Yongluo Jiang *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Jianmin YuanCentral Research Institute, Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai, China.
Haining WangUnited Imaging Research Institute of Innovative Medical Equipment, Shenzhen, China.
Dong LiangLauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Wei FanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Zhanli HuLauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Na ZhangLauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology · CNSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CNUnited Imaging Healthcare (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lowering the dose for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging reduces patients' radiation burden but decreases the image quality by increasing noise and reducing imaging detail and quantifications. This paper introduces a method for acquiring high-quality PET images from an ultra-low-dose state to achieve both high-quality images and a low radiation burden. Methods: We developed a two-task-based end-to-end generative adversarial network, named bi-c-GAN, that incorporated the advantages of PET and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modalities to synthesize high-quality PET images from an ultra-low-dose input. Moreover, a combined loss, including the mean absolute error, structural loss, and bias loss, was created to improve the trained model's performance. Real integrated PET/MRI data from 67 patients' axial heads (each with 161 slices) were used for training and validation purposes. Synthesized images were quantified by the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), normalized mean square error (NMSE), structural similarity (SSIM), and contrast noise ratio (CNR). The improvement ratios of these four selected quantitative metrics were used to compare the images produced by bi-c-GAN with other methods. Results: In the four-fold cross-validation, the proposed bi-c-GAN outperformed the other three selected methods (U-net, c-GAN, and multiple input c-GAN). With the bi-c-GAN, in a 5% low-dose PET, the image quality was higher than that of the other three methods by at least 6.7% in the PSNR, 0.6% in the SSIM, 1.3% in the NMSE, and 8% in the CNR. In the hold-out validation, bi-c-GAN improved the image quality compared to U-net and c-GAN in both 2.5% and 10% low-dose PET. For example, the PSNR using bi-C-GAN was at least 4.46% in the 2.5% low-dose PET and at most 14.88% in the 10% low-dose PET. Visual examples also showed a higher quality of images generated from the proposed method, demonstrating the denoising and improving ability of bi-c-GAN. Conclusions: By taking advantage of integrated PET/MR images and multitask deep learning (MDL), the proposed bi-c-GAN can efficiently improve the image quality of ultra-low-dose PET and reduce radiation exposure.

Indexed as

bias lossIntegrated PET/MRImultitask deep learning (MDL)ultra-low-dose positron emission tomography (PET)

Identifiers

PMID36465830
PMCPMC9703111
OpenAlexW4306858732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.