ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
Development and validation of a prediction model of pneumothorax after CT-guided coaxial core needle lung biopsy.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical potential of computed tomography-guided coaxial needle sequence puncture with suture-anchored needle guidance and coupled needle retraction-and-advancement technique biopsy of pulmonary nodules.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Trial
- Preoperative computed tomography-guided localization of pulmonary nodules: comparison between tailed coil and suture anchor localization.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2026Article
- Pleural tail sign in computed tomography-guided lung biopsy: an imaging predictor of severe pneumothorax requiring chest tube placement.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026Article
- Machine learning predicts severe adverse events and salvage success of CT-guided lung biopsy after nondiagnostic transbronchial lung biopsy.European radiology · 2026Article
- Comments on parenchymal blood patching in CT-guided lung biopsy.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2026Article
- SinglePass electrocautery device for closure of lung and mediastinal biopsy: a case series of 5 patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- A nomogram model for predicting pneumothorax after CT-guided localization of pulmonary nodules using autologous blood and methylene blue.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Preoperative computed tomography-guided localization pulmonary nodules: comparison between accura and soft anchored wires.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Impact of radiomics features, pulmonary emphysema score and muscle mass on the rate of pneumothorax and chest tube insertion in CT-guided lung biopsies.Respiratory research · 2024Article
- Presurgical computed tomography-guided localization of lung ground glass nodules: comparing hook-wire and indocyanine green.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Ground-glass opacities: a problem bound to get more challenging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pneumothorax is the most common complication of computed tomography-guided coaxial core needle biopsy (CCNB) and may be life-threatening. We aimed to evaluate the risk factors and develop a model for predicting pneumothorax in patients undergoing computed tomography-guided CCNB, and to further determine its clinical utility. Methods: Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent risk factors for pneumothorax from 18 variables. A predictive model was established using multivariable logistic regression and presented as a nomogram based on a training cohort of 690 patients who underwent computed tomography-guided CCNB. The model was validated in 253 consecutive patients in the validation cohort and 250 patients in the test cohort. The area under the curve was used to determine the predictive accuracy of the proposed model. Results: The risk factors associated with pneumothorax after computed tomography-guided CCNB were sex, patient position, lung field, lesion contact with the pleura, lesion size, distance from the pleura to the lesion, presence of emphysema adjacent to the biopsy tract, and crossing fissures. The predictive model that incorporated these predictors showed good predictive performance in the training cohort [area under the curve, 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.67-0.75)], validation cohort [0.71 (0.64-0.78)], and internal test cohort [0.68 (0.60-0.75)]. The nomogram also provided excellent calibration and discrimination, and decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated its clinical utility. Conclusions: The predictive model showed good performance for pneumothorax after computed tomography-guided CCNB and may help improve individualized preoperative prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.