ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
Preoperative evaluation of liver regeneration following hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance elastography.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiomics Beyond Radiology: Literature Review on Prediction of Future Liver Remnant Volume and Function Before Hepatic Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Preoperative assessment of liver regeneration using T1 mapping and the functional liver imaging score derived from Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance for patient with hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- A diagnostic test of three-dimensional magnetic resonance elastography imaging for preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion in patients with T1 stage clear cell renal carcinoma.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: For patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing hepatectomy, insufficient remnant liver regenerative capacity can lead to liver failure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential role of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for the preoperative prediction of liver regeneration in patients with HCC after partial hepatectomy (PH). Methods: A total of 54 patients with HCC undergoing MRE prior to PH were retrospectively included. The total functional liver, volume of preoperative future liver remnant (LVpre), and volume of postoperative liver remnant (LVpost), respectively, were measured, and the regeneration index (RI) and parenchymal hepatic resection rate (PHRR) were manually calculated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with a high RI, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the liver stiffness (LS) values. Patients were classified into three subgroups based on the value of PHRR: low PHRR (<30%), intermediate PHRR (30-50%), and high PHRR (>50%). Subsequently, Spearman correlation analysis was used to investigate the relationship between LS values and RI in the subgroups. Results: Multivariable analysis revealed a low LS value was associated with greater odds of a high RI [odds ratio (OR), 0.049; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.002 to 0.980]. An optimal cutoff value of 3.30 kPa was used to divide all patients into a low RI group and a high RI group with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.882 (95% CI: 0.767 to 0.996). A significant negative relationship between RI and LS values (r=-0.799; P<0.001) was observed in the intermediate PHRR subgroup. Conclusions: The LS values based on MRE may serve as a potential preoperative predictor of liver regeneration for patients with HCC undergoing PH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.