Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36465807›Full record

ReviewInfection and drug resistance2022

Mortality-Related Risk Factors and Novel Antimicrobial Regimens for Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections: A Systematic Review.

Qin Hu, Jinglan Chen, Shusen Sun, Sheng Deng

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infection and drug resistance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06650384 (Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of N-Acetylcysteine Versus Alpha-Lipoic Acid on the Occurrence and Severity of Colistin-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Critically Ill Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06650384 phase2 / phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of N-Acetylcysteine Versus Alpha-Lipoic Acid on the Occurrence and Severity of Colistin-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Critically Ill Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled180ConditionsNephrotoxicityArmsAddition of sachets of N-acetyl cysteine 1200 mg twice/day to the maintenance dose of colistin, Addition of Alpha-lipoic acid 600mg twice daily to the maintenance dose of colistin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The Emergence ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance in Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. The importance of monitoring a new antibiotic: ceftazidime/avibactam usage and resistance experience from England, 2016 to 2020.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Epidemiology of Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Qin Hu *Department of Pharmacy, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China.
Jinglan Chen *Department of Pharmacy, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China.
Shusen SunDepartment of Pharmacy, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-9014-7329
Sheng DengDepartment of Pharmacy, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China.
Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) has become a significant public health problem in the last decade. We aimed to explore the risk factors of mortality in patients with CRE infections and to focus on the current evidence on antimicrobial regimens for CRE infections, particularly from the perspective of mortality. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed by searching the databases of EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies that evaluated mortality-related risk factors and antimicrobial regimens for CRE infections published from 2012 to 2022. Results: In total, 33 and 28 studies were included to analyze risk factors and antibiotic treatment, respectively. The risk factors most frequently reported as significantly associated with CRE mortality were antibiotic use (92.9%; 26/28 studies), comorbidities (88.7%; 23/26 studies), and hospital-related factors (82.8%; 24/29 studies). In 10 studies that did not contain ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI) therapy, seven demonstrated significantly lower mortality in combination therapy than in monotherapy. However, 5 of 6 studies identified no substantial difference between CAZ-AVI monotherapy and CAZ-AVI combination therapy. Six studies reported substantially lower mortality in CAZ-AVI regimens than in other regimens. Conclusion: Several risk factors, particularly antibiotic use and patients' comorbidities, are strong risk factors for CRE mortality. The optimal regimen for CRE infections remains controversial. Combination therapy should be considered when carbapenems, colistin, tigecycline, or aminoglycosides are administered. CAZ-AVI appears to be a promising antibiotic for CRE infections. Most importantly, treatment should be individualized according to the source and severity of the disease or other highly related risk factors.

Indexed as

antimicrobialcarbapenem resistant EnterobacteriaceaeCREmortalityrisk factorstreatment

Identifiers

PMID36465807
PMCPMC9717588
OpenAlexW4310249358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.