Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36465770›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

Microbiota Dysbiosis a Cause of Colorectal Cancer or Not? A Systematic Review.

Godfrey Tabowei, Greeshma N Gaddipati, Maria Mukhtar, Mohammed J Alzubaidee, Raga Sruthi Dwarampudi, Sheena Mathew, Sumahitha Bichenapally, Vahe Khachatryan, Asmaa Muazzam, Chandani Hamal and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Microbiota in colorectal cancer related to liver metastasis.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Association ofHeliyon · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Godfrey TaboweiDepartment of Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Greeshma N GaddipatiDepartment of Research, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Maria MukhtarDepartment of Research, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Mohammed J AlzubaideeDepartment of Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Raga Sruthi DwarampudiDepartment of Research, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Sheena MathewDepartment of Research, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Sumahitha BichenapallyDepartment of Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Vahe KhachatryanDepartment of Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Asmaa MuazzamDepartment of Pathology Research, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Chandani HamalDepartment of Internal Medicine/Department of Family Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Lakshmi Sai Deepak Reddy VelugotiDepartment of Research, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Lubna MohammedDepartment of Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deaths from colorectal cancer (CRC) are still rising, and various links to etiology have been proposed. However, a direct link between microbial dysbiosis and colorectal cancer has not been postulated. This study aimed to identify the role of microbes in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer. This systematic review was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic search was done considering papers published over the past 12 years, using PubMed, PubMed Central, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect databases. Studies were selected based on the following predefined eligibility criteria: English-language systematic reviews, meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and clinical trials, which included papers on microbes playing roles in colorectal cancer with the derived data transferred to a template. Following this, quality assessment was done using each study's relevant assessment tool. The initial search generated 128 studies. From the study, we found the ratio of

Indexed as

colerectal carcinogenesismicrobes and colorectal cancermicrobes associated with crcmicrobes or ("microbiota" [all fields] or "microbiome" [all fields]) and ("colorectal cancer" [all fields] or "colorectal carcinogenesis" [all fields] or "colon cancer" [all fields] or "rectal cancer" [all fields])microbial dysbiosis

Identifiers

PMID36465770
PMCPMC9711892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.