Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36465764›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Quality of Life Assessment for Men With Gynecomastia in Saudi Arabia.

Muna F Alnaim, Jawaher I Alraihan, Nouf M Al Rabiah, Basem Zogel, Samar M Alfaifi, Aishah N Azam, Abdulrahman O Baghdadi, Basem K Alhusaini

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Gynecomastia Surgery: Liposuction Alone versus Liposuction with Endoscope-Assisted Glandular Excision-A Comparative Study.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Muna F AlnaimDepartment of Surgery, King Faisal University, Al Hofuf, SAU.
Jawaher I AlraihanDepartment of Surgery, King Faisal University, Al Hofuf, SAU.
Nouf M Al RabiahDepartment of surgery, King Faisal University, Al Hofuf, SAU.
Basem ZogelMedicine and Surgery, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Samar M AlfaifiMedicine and Surgery, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Aishah N AzamDepartment of Surgery, King Salman Bin Abdulaziz Medical Hospital, Al Madinah, SAU.
Abdulrahman O BaghdadiDepartment of Surgery, King Abdulaziz Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Basem K AlhusainiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, King Fahad General Hospital, Al Madinah, SAU.
King Fahad Hospital Jeddah · SAKing Abdulaziz Hospital · SAKing Faisal University · SAJazan University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGynecomastia, defined as a benign proliferation of the breasts in males, is a common pathology of breasts among adolescent males. The root cause behind the condition is the hormonal imbalance between androgens and estrogens at the time of puberty. Different treatment options can be used; however, surgery is the preferred option. The quality of life (QoL) of affected Individuals is usually affected in all aspects.

objectivesThe aim of the study is to assess the QoL of male Saudi patients diagnosed with gynecomastia and their desire to undergo surgical treatment.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted using an Arabic self-administered online questionnaire that targeted males in Saudi Arabia and was distributed throughout the kingdom.

resultsA total of 681 participants were involved in this study. Most of the participants were Saudi (n = 607; 90.6%) and married (n = 158; 79%). Approximately, half of the participants were between 18 and 29 years of age (n = 337; 49.5%), while 41.1% and 9.3% were between 30 and 49 years and more than 50 years old, respectively. About 29.5% of the participants were from the middle region, while 26.7% of them were from the northern region, followed by 19.5% of participants from the western region, and only 14.4% and 9.8% from the eastern or southern region. On analysis of different domains, there was no statistically significant difference between participants with gynecomastia and the control group in QoL.

conclusionsPatients showed no statistically significant change in the QoL between those diagnosed with gynecomastia and those in the control group. Also, more than one-third of our patients did not want to undergo breast reduction surgery.

Indexed as

breast reductiongynecomastiakingdom of saudi arabia (ksa)mastectomyquality of life (qol)questionnaire study

Identifiers

PMID36465764
PMCPMC9710853
OpenAlexW4307715009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.