ReviewCureus2022
ST-Segment Elevation in Conditions of Non-cardiovascular Origin Mimicking an Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The STEMI Mimic: Cocaine-Associated Pulmonary Embolism With ST-Segment Elevation.Case reports in cardiology · 2026Article
- Myocardial Infarction and Pulmonary Embolism: Causal or Temporal Association?JACC. Case reports · 2024Article
- Beyond Cardiology: A Rare Encounter With Small Bowel Obstruction Disguised as Inferior Wall ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.ACG case reports journal · 2024Article
- Acute Coronary Syndrome: Treatment Strategies and Outcomes in Patients Admitted to a Tertiary Care Hospital in Palestine.Patient preference and adherence · 2024Article
- Article
- Pseudo-myocardial infarction in a case of traumatic diaphragmatic hernia.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The most widespread presenting ailments among patients visiting the emergency department are chest pain and shortness of breath. These symptoms lead any doctor to a probable diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI). Detailed patient history, testing of blood samples for cardiac biomarkers that are indicative of cardiovascular necrosis, ultrasound methods, electrocardiography, and coronary computed tomography (CT) could all be beneficial to support the diagnosis. Out of these, electrocardiography is the most important and commonly done investigation in the emergency departments for patients presenting with chest pain and shortness of breath. However, interpreting these patients' electrocardiograms (ECGs) may be a matter of concern and worry. T wave and ST-segment changes are often of interest in the early signs of myocardial ischemia. Despite its incredible sensitivity, ST-segment deviation (elevated or depressed) has a low specificity because it can be seen in a variety of other cardiac and non-cardiac diseases. When ST-segment anomalies are identified, clinicians must consider many additional characteristics (such as risk factors, symptoms, and anamnesis), as well as all other possible diagnoses. All of these scenarios of patients presenting in the emergency department with chest discomfort and shortness of breath showing ST-segment abnormalities can leave a healthcare professional wondering whether to start treatment for acute myocardial infarction, through either the administration of a fibrinolytic agent, exposing patients to both the benefits and risks of fibrinolysis, or invasive coronary angiography. An astute physician may be able to recognize fabricated differential diagnosis mimicking ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in some situations. Failure to recognize these imposters can result in inefficient resource utilization, which can expose patients to unjustified risk and increased rather than decreased death and morbidity. Since the danger of cerebral hemorrhage from blood thinners is significant, in patient-care scenarios, in order to rule out percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), a thorough assessment of the ECG is essential to consider diseases other than acute myocardial infarction, especially the ones that are non-cardiac in origin. The goal of this narrative review is to give an overview of the significant disorders that are non-cardiac in origin that can mimic an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.