Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36465684›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2022

Phenotypic plasticity determines differences between the skulls of tigers from mainland Asia.

David M Cooper, Nobuyuki Yamaguchi, David W Macdonald, Olga G Nanova, Viktor G Yudin, Andrew J Dugmore, Andrew C Kitchener

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

David M CooperDepartment of Natural Sciences, National Museums Scotland, Edinburgh EH1 1JF, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7578-1890
Nobuyuki YamaguchiInstitute of Tropical Biodiversity and Sustainable Development, University Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu 21030, Malaysia.
David W MacdonaldWildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, The Recanti-Kaplan Centre, Tubney House, Abingdon Road, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX13 5QL, UK.
Olga G NanovaZoological Museum, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Bolshaya Nikitskaya 2, Moscow 119991, Russia.
Viktor G YudinFederal Scientific Centre for the Biodiversity of Terrestrial Biota of East Asia, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Primorskij kraj, Russia.
Andrew J DugmoreInstitute of Geography, School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK.
Andrew C KitchenerDepartment of Natural Sciences, National Museums Scotland, Edinburgh EH1 1JF, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2594-0827
National Museums Scotland · GBCity University of New York · USFederal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity FEB RAS · RULomonosov Moscow State University · RUUniversiti Malaysia Terengganu · MYUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tiger subspecific taxonomy is controversial because of morphological and genetic variation found between now fragmented populations, yet the extent to which phenotypic plasticity or genetic variation affects phenotypes of putative tiger subspecies has not been explicitly addressed. In order to assess the role of phenotypic plasticity in determining skull variation, we compared skull morphology among continental tigers from zoos and the wild. In turn, we examine continental tiger skulls from across their wild range, to evaluate how the different environmental conditions experienced by individuals in the wild can influence morphological variation. Fifty-seven measurements from 172 specimens were used to analyse size and shape differences among wild and captive continental tiger skulls. Captive specimens have broader skulls, and shorter rostral depths and mandible heights than wild specimens. In addition, sagittal crest size is larger in wild Amur tigers compared with those from captivity, and it is larger in wild Amur tigers compared with other wild continental tigers. The degree of phenotypic plasticity shown by the sagittal crest, skull width and rostral height suggests that the distinctive shape of Amur tiger skulls compared with that of other continental tigers is mostly a phenotypically plastic response to differences in their environments.

Indexed as

captive/wild comparisonmorphometricsPanthera tigrisphenotypic plasticitytaxonomyzoo welfare

Identifiers

PMID36465684
PMCPMC9709513
OpenAlexW4310788024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.