Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36465666›Full record

ReviewCurrent otorhinolaryngology reports2022

Investigations and Outcomes for Olfactory Disorders.

Louis Luke, Liam Lee, Lavandan Jegatheeswaran, Carl Philpott

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current otorhinolaryngology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A Cross-Sectional Study Exploring Patient Experiences, Unmet Needs and Desired Support in Those With Olfactory Dysfunction.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Delivery of Topical Drugs to the Olfactory Cleft.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Louis LukeEar, Nose and Throat (ENT) Department, James Paget University Hospital, James Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Great Yarmouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4435-4970
Liam LeeNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Lavandan JegatheeswaranEar, Nose and Throat (ENT) Department, James Paget University Hospital, James Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Great Yarmouth, UK.
Carl PhilpottEar, Nose and Throat (ENT) Department, James Paget University Hospital, James Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Great Yarmouth, UK.
University of East Anglia · GBJames Paget University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: To provide a detailed overview of the investigations and core outcome measures for olfactory disorders. Recent Findings: Olfactory disorders can have a detrimental impact to the quality of life of patients. There are a wide range of causes of olfactory loss including sinonasal conditions, idiopathic, post-head trauma or infection. This review highlights the key investigations and reasoning for their use to clinically assess and research patients with olfactory disorders. In addition, this review outlines the core outcome measures for olfaction that will help inform future research in olfactory disorders. Summary: A systematic approach with history taking and examination particularly with nasal endoscopy can determine the cause of the olfactory disorder in most cases. Specific olfactory disorder questionnaires can demonstrate the impact on quality of life, while psychophysical testing can objectively assess and monitor olfaction over time. Olfactory-evoked potentials and functional MRI are reserved for research, whereas CT and MRI imaging are used depending on history and examination. A core outcome set for olfaction has been developed that will help standardise the outcome measures used in olfaction and olfactory disorders research.

Indexed as

AnosmiaHyposmiaInvestigationOlfactionOlfactory disordersOutcome

Identifiers

PMID36465666
PMCPMC9707095
OpenAlexW4310357366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.