Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36465663›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Metabolomics study identified bile acids as potential biomarkers for gastric cancer: A case control study.

Chen Pan, Dawei Deng, Tianfu Wei, Zeming Wu, Biao Zhang, Qihang Yuan, Guogang Liang, Yanfeng Liu, Peiyuan Yin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chen PanDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Dawei DengDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Tianfu WeiDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Zeming WuiPhenome Biotechnology (Yun Pu Kang) Inc., Dalian, China.
Biao ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Qihang YuanDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Guogang LiangDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Yanfeng LiuDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Peiyuan YinClinical Laboratory of Integrative Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Dalian Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) is a common lethal malignancy worldwide. Gastroscopy is an effective screening technique for decreasing mortality. However, there are still limited useful non-invasive markers for early detection of GC. Bile acids are important molecules for the modulation of energy metabolism. With an in-depth targeted method for accurate quantitation of 80 bile acids (BAs), we aimed to find potential biomarkers for the early screening of GC. A cohort with 280 participants was enrolled, including 113 GC, 22 benign gastric lesions (BGL) and 145 healthy controls. Potential markers were identified using a random forest machine algorithm in the discovery cohort (n=180), then validated in an internal validation cohort (n=78) and a group with 22 BGL. The results represented significant alterations in the circulating BA pool between GC and the controls. BAs also exhibited significant correlations with various clinical traits. Then, we developed a diagnostic panel that comprised six BAs or ratios for GC detection. The panel showed high accuracy for the diagnosis of GC with AUC of 1 (95%CI: 1.00-1.00) and 0.98 (95%CI: 0.93-1.00) in the discovery and validation cohort, respectively. This 6-BAs panel was also able to identify early GC with AUC of 1 (95%CI: 0.999-1.00) and 0.94 (95%CI: 0.83-1.00) in the discovery and validation cohort, respectively. Meanwhile, this panel achieved a good differential diagnosis between GC and BGL and the AUC was 0.873 (95%CI: 0.812-0.934). The alternations of serum bile acids are characteristic metabolic features of GC. Bile acids could be promising biomarkers for the early diagnosis of GC.

Indexed as

Bile Acids and SaltsStomach NeoplasmsBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesHumansMetabolomicsBile Acids and SaltsBiomarkersbile acidsbiomarkersgastric cancerLC MSmetabolomics

Identifiers

PMID36465663
PMCPMC9715751
OpenAlexW4309457582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.