Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36465660›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Circadian acclimatization of performance, sleep, and 6-sulfatoxymelatonin using multiple phase shifting stimuli.

Shawn D Youngstedt, Jeffrey Elliott, Salma Patel, Natalie Zi-Ching Mak, Evan Raiewski, Elias Malek, Michael Strong, Chung Jung Mun, Tyler Peters, Remun Madlol and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Human-Centric Lighting Research and Policy in the Melanopsin Age.Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Shawn D YoungstedtEdson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Jeffrey ElliottDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Salma PatelDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Natalie Zi-Ching MakDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Evan RaiewskiDepartment of Psychology, California State University, San Marcos, CA, United States.
Elias MalekDepartment of Kinesiology and Nutrition Sciences, Univeristy of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
Michael StrongDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Chung Jung MunEdson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Tyler PetersDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Remun MadlolDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Natasha TasevskaEdson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Massiullah RasoulDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Cindy NguyenDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Kimberly M Vargas NegreteDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Andejola-Omobonike AdaralegbeDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Sruthi SudalaimuthuDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Delaney GranholmDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Anastasia FinchDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Aryan EksambeDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Anannya MalreadyDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Sairam ParthasarathyDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
University of Arizona · USArizona State University · USCalifornia State University, San Marcos · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Nevada, Las Vegas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Misalignment between the environment and one's circadian system is a common phenomenon (e.g., jet lag) which can have myriad negative effects on physical and mental health, mental and physiological performance, and sleep. Absent any intervention, the circadian system adjusts only 0.5-1.0 h per day to a shifted light-dark and sleep-wake schedule. Bright light facilitates circadian adjustment, but in field studies, bright light is only modestly better than no stimulus. Evidence indicates that exercise and melatonin can be combined with bright light to elicit larger shifts but no study has combined all of these stimuli or administered them at the times that are known to elicit the largest effects on the circadian system. The aims of this study are to compare the effects of different treatments on circadian adjustment to simulated jet lag in a laboratory. Following 2 weeks of home recording, 36 adults will spend 6.5 consecutive days in the laboratory. Following an 8 h period of baseline sleep recording on the participant's usual sleep schedule on Night 1 (e.g., 0000-0800 h), participants will undergo a 26 h circadian assessment protocol involving 2 h wake intervals in dim light and 1 h of sleep in darkness, repeated throughout the 26 h. During this protocol, all urine voidings will be collected; mood, sleepiness, psychomotor vigilance, and pain sensitivity will be assessed every 3 h, forehead temperature will be assessed every 90 min, and anaerobic performance (Wingate test) will be tested every 6 h. Following, the circadian assessment protocol, the participant's sleep-wake and light dark schedule will be delayed by 8 h compared with baseline (e.g., 0800-1400 h), analogous to travelling 8 times zones westward. This shifted schedule will be maintained for 3 days. During the 3 days on the delayed schedule, participants will be randomized to one of 3 treatments: (1) Dim Red Light + Placebo Capsules, (2) Bright Light Alone, (3) Bright Light + Exercise + Melatonin. During the final 26 h, all conditions and measures of the baseline circadian protocol will be repeated. Acclimatization will be defined by shifts in circadian rhythms of aMT6s, psychomotor vigilance, Wingate Anaerobic performance, mood, and sleepiness, and less impairments in these measures during the shifted schedule compared with baseline. We posit that Bright Light Alone and Bright Light + Exercise + Melatonin will elicit greater shifts in circadian rhythms and less impairments in sleep, mood, performance, and sleepiness compared with Dim Red Light + Placebo Capsules. We also posit that Bright Light + Exercise + Melatonin will elicit greater shifts and less impairments than Bright Light Alone.

Indexed as

MelatoninAcclimatizationAdultHumansJet Lag SyndromeSleepSleepiness6-sulfatoxymelatoninMelatoninbright lightcircadian misalignmentexercisejet lag disordermelatonin

Identifiers

PMID36465660
PMCPMC9710383
OpenAlexW4309308783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.