ReviewBehavior analysis in practice2022
Planning Positive Reinforcement Cycles in Behavior Intervention Plans.
Review in Behavior analysis in practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Food Swamps and Transportation Access: Intersecting Structural Determinants of Food Shopping and Access in Marginalized Urban Communities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Understanding and Reacting to Relapse: Considerations for Practitioners.Behavior analysis in practice · 2025Review
- An educational initiative aimed at increasing antimicrobial resistance awareness among school-going Jordanian youth.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Behavior analysts partner with educators in schools to support the creation of behavior intervention plans (BIPs). Assessment and intervention planning often focuses on the relational contingencies between the student and their environment, with little attention paid to the relational contingencies contacted by the educator. In this article, we posit that planning should simultaneously include contingencies for both the student and the educator as BIPs are created. Specifically, we aim to explore a dual-pathway intervention plan in which student and educator access to reinforcement is simultaneously designed to increase both educators' implementation of high-quality instruction and students' engagement and performance. Procedural steps outlining the duality of intervention planning for both the student and the educator, as well as a theoretical model for considering contextual and reinforcement contingencies for both parties, will be detailed in a step-by-step guide to support readers' creation and implementation of plans to support improved educator and student performance. Planning for supporting both the educator and student may increase sustained, high-quality instruction and improved student outcomes for students with behavioral support needs. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40617-021-00663-8.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.