Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36465532›Full record

ReviewJACS Au2022

The Time and Place for Nature in Drug Discovery.

Robert J Young, Sabine L Flitsch, Michael Grigalunas, Paul D Leeson, Ronald J Quinn, Nicholas J Turner, Herbert Waldmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JACS Au, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Antimicrobial Peptide-Peptoid Macrocycles from the Polymyxin B2 Chemical Space.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Chemical space as a unifying theme for chemistry.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robert J YoungBlue Burgundy Ltd, Ampthill, Bedfordshire MK45 2AD, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7763-0575
Sabine L FlitschDepartment of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3974-646X
Michael GrigalunasDepartment of Chemical Biology, Max-Planck-Institute of Molecular Physiology, Otto-Hahn Strasse 11, 44227 Dortmund, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0419-8168
Paul D LeesonPaul Leeson Consulting Limited, The Malt House, Main Street, Congerstone, Nuneaton, Warwickshire CV13 6LZ, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0212-3437
Ronald J QuinnGriffith Institute for Drug Discovery, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland 4111, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4022-2623
Nicholas J TurnerDepartment of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8708-0781
Herbert WaldmannDepartment of Chemical Biology, Max-Planck-Institute of Molecular Physiology, Otto-Hahn Strasse 11, 44227 Dortmund, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9606-7247

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The case for a renewed focus on Nature in drug discovery is reviewed; not in terms of natural product screening, but how and why biomimetic molecules, especially those produced by natural processes, should deliver in the age of artificial intelligence and screening of vast collections both in vitro and in silico. The declining natural product-likeness of licensed drugs and the consequent physicochemical implications of this trend in the context of current practices are noted. To arrest these trends, the logic of seeking new bioactive agents with enhanced natural mimicry is considered; notably that molecules constructed by proteins (enzymes) are more likely to interact with other proteins (e.g., targets and transporters), a notion validated by natural products. Nature's finite number of building blocks and their interactions necessarily reduce potential numbers of structures, yet these enable expansion of chemical space with their inherent diversity of physical characteristics, pertinent to property-based design. The feasible variations on natural motifs are considered and expanded to encompass pseudo-natural products, leading to the further logical step of harnessing bioprocessing routes to access them. Together, these offer opportunities for enhancing natural mimicry, thereby bringing innovation to drug synthesis exploiting the characteristics of natural recognition processes. The potential for computational guidance to help identifying binding commonalities in the route map is a logical opportunity to enable the design of tailored molecules, with a focus on "organic/biological" rather than purely "synthetic" structures. The design and synthesis of prototype structures should pay dividends in the disposition and efficacy of the molecules, while inherently enabling greener and more sustainable manufacturing techniques.

Identifiers

PMID36465532
PMCPMC9709949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.