Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36465377›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022

Evolving imaging methods of prostate cancer and the emergence of magnetic resonance imaging guided ablation techniques.

Mikael Anttinen, Roberto Blanco Sequeiros, Peter J Boström, Pekka Taimen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05917860 (Effect of Neoadjuvant Degarelix on MRI-guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05917860 phase1active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Neoadjuvant Degarelix on MRI-guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation (TULSA) in Patients with Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: a Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorTurku University HospitalRan2023 to 2030Enrolled15ConditionsLocalized Prostate Carcinoma, Castration-Naive Prostate Cancer, Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer, Prostate CancerArmsDegarelix, MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mikael AnttinenDepartment of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Roberto Blanco SequeirosDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Peter J BoströmDepartment of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Pekka TaimenInstitute of Biomedicine and FICAN West Cancer Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Turku University Hospital · FIUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Established therapies for prostate cancer (PCa), surgery and radiotherapy, treat the entire gland regardless of the location of the cancerous lesion within the prostate. Although effective, these methods include a significant risk of worsening genitourinary outcomes. Targeted image-guided cancer therapy has gained acceptance through improved PCa detection, localization, and characterization by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Minimally-invasive ablative techniques aim to achieve comparable oncological outcomes to radical treatment while preserving genitourinary function. Transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) and next-generation transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) utilize MRI guidance to thermally ablate prostate tissue under real-time MRI monitoring and active temperature feedback control. Previous trials performed by our group and others, including a large multicenter study in men with localized favorable-risk disease, have demonstrated that TULSA provides effective prostate ablation with a favorable safety profile and low impact on quality of life. Recently, MRI-guided HIFU focal therapy was also shown as a safe and effective treatment of intermediate-risk PCa. Here we review the current literature on ablative techniques in the treatment of localized PCa with a focus on TULSA and HIFU methods.

Indexed as

ablation therapyHIFUhigh-intensity focused ultrasoundmagnetic resonance imagingMRIprostate cancertransurethral ultrasound ablationTulsa

Identifiers

PMID36465377
PMCPMC9714456
OpenAlexW4309609037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.