Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36465370›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Multi-parameter ultrasonography-based predictive model for breast cancer diagnosis.

Jing Chen, Ji Ma, Chunxiao Li, Sihui Shao, Yijin Su, Rong Wu, Minghua Yao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jing ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ji MaDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Chunxiao LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Sihui ShaoDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yijin SuDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Rong WuDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Minghua YaoDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai First People's Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To develop, validate, and evaluate a predictive model for breast cancer diagnosis using conventional ultrasonography (US), shear wave elastography (SWE), and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS). Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 674 patients with 674 breast lesions. The data, a main and an independent datasets, were divided into three cohorts. Cohort 1 (80% of the main dataset; n = 448) was analyzed by logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors and establish the predictive model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was analyzed in Cohort 2 (20% of the main dataset; n = 119) to validate and in Cohort 3 (the independent dataset; n = 107) to evaluate the predictive model. Results: Multivariable regression analysis revealed nine independent breast cancer risk factors, including age > 40 years; ill-defined margin, heterogeneity, rich blood flow, and abnormal axillary lymph nodes on US; enhanced area enlargement, contrast agent retention, and irregular shape on CEUS; mean SWE higher than the cutoff value (P < 0.05 for all). The diagnostic performance of the model was good, with AUC values of 0.847, 0.857, and 0.774 for Cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The model increased the diagnostic specificity (from 31% to 81.3% and 7.3% to 73.1% in cohorts 2 and 3, respectively) without a significant loss in sensitivity (from 100.0% to 90.1% and 100.0% to 81.8% in cohorts 2 and 3, respectively). Conclusion: The multi-parameter US-based model showed good performance in breast cancer diagnosis, improving specificity without a significant loss in sensitivity. Using the model could reduce unnecessary biopsies and guide clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Indexed as

breast cancercontrast-enhanced ultrasounddiagnostic modelmulti-parameter ultrasonographyshear wave elastography

Identifiers

PMID36465370
PMCPMC9714455
OpenAlexW4309606316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.