Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36465344›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Combination of PI-RADS score and PSAD can improve the diagnostic accuracy of prostate cancer and reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.

Changming Wang, Lei Yuan, Deyun Shen, Bin Zhang, Baorui Wu, Panrui Zhang, Jun Xiao, Tao Tao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Changming WangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC of China, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Lei YuanDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Deyun ShenDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC of China, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Bin ZhangDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Anhui Provincial Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Baorui WuDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC of China, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Panrui ZhangHefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale, The CAS Key Laboratory of Innate Immunity and Chronic Disease, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Jun XiaoDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC of China, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Tao TaoDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC of China, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the clinical variables of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and to provide a strategy to reduce unnecessary biopsies. Patients and methods: A Chinese cohort that consists of 833 consecutive patients who underwent prostate biopsies from January 2018 to April 2022 was collected in this retrospective study. Diagnostic ability for total PCa and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) was evaluated by prostate imaging-reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score and other clinical variables. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to figure out the independent predictors. Diagnostic accuracy was estimated by plotting receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: The results of univariate and multivariable analyses demonstrated that the PI-RADS score (P < 0.001, OR: 5.724, 95% CI: 4.517-7.253)/(P < 0.001, OR: 5.199, 95% CI: 4.039-6.488) and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) (P < 0.001, OR: 2.756, 95% CI: 1.560-4.870)/(P < 0.001, OR: 4.726, 95% CI: 2.661-8.396) were the independent clinical factors for predicting total PCa/csPCa. The combination of the PI-RADS score and PSAD presented the best diagnostic performance for the detection of PCa and csPCa. For the diagnostic criterion of "PI-RADS score ≥ 3 or PSAD ≥ 0.3", the sensitivity and negative predictive values were 94.0% and 93.1% for the diagnosis of total PCa and 99.2% and 99.3% for the diagnosis of csPCa, respectively. For the diagnostic criterion "PI-RADS score >3 and PSAD ≥ 0.3", the specificity and positive predictive values were 96.8% and 92.6% for the diagnosis of total PCa and 93.5% and 82.4% for the diagnosis of csPCa, respectively. Conclusions: The combination of the PI-RADS score and PSAD can implement the extraordinary diagnostic performance of PCa. Many patients may safely execute active surveillance or take systematic treatment without prostate biopsies by stratification according to the PI-RADS score and the value of PSAD.

Indexed as

multiparameter magnetic resonance imagingprostate biopsyprostate cancerprostate imaging-reporting and data system scoreprostate-specific antigen density

Identifiers

PMID36465344
PMCPMC9709422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.